Immediate Placement and Loading of Maxillary Single- Tooth Implants: A 3-Year Prospective Study of Marginal Bone Level

Berbéri, Antoine; Noujeim, Ziad; Kanj, Wasfi; Mearawi, Rita; Salameh, Ziad

doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1515

Cited by 17 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To the author's knowledge this is the first report analyzing the OAOT approach over a five‐year period. Considering a three‐year period, results are similar to the ones obtained by Berberi et al They achieved a medium bone loss of 0.26mm, similar to the 0.25mm obtained in the same period with the present research. Canullo et al in a research analyzing the OAOT technique over 3 years reported a 0.34mm of bone resorption, slightly superior to the data obtained in the present work.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Five‐year cohort prospective study on single implants in the esthetic area restored using one‐abutment/one‐time prosthetic approach

Canullo¹,

Omori

Amari

et al. 2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Five‐year cohort prospective study on single implants in the esthetic area restored using one‐abutment/one‐time prosthetic approach

Canullo¹,

Omori

Amari

et al. 2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…After retrieving the full text, 21 of them were further excluded. Five of them were animal studies[ 7 , 35 – 38 ], two were in vitro studies[ 39 , 40 ], one is a review[ 33 ] and 11 were case reports and case series[ 32 , 41 – 50 ]. One study [ 29 ] reported implants with external connection and non-platform switching.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

One-time versus repeated abutment connection for platform-switched implant: A systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThis review aims to compare peri-implant tissue changes in terms of clinical and radiographic aspects of implant restoration protocol using one-time abutment to repeated abutment connection in platform switched implant.MethodA structured search strategy was applied to three electronic databases, namely, Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science. Eight eligible studies, including seven randomised controlled studies and one controlled clinical study, were identified in accordance with inclusion/exclusion criteria. Outcome measures included peri-implant bone changes (mm), peri-implant soft tissue changes (mm), probing depth (mm) and postsurgical complications.ResultSix studies were pooled for meta-analysis on bone tissue, three for soft tissue, two for probing depth and four for postsurgical complications. A total of 197 implants were placed in one-time abutment group, whereas 214 implants were included in repeated abutment group. The implant systems included Global implants, Ankylos, JDEvolution (JdentalCare), Straumann Bone level and Conelog-Screwline. One-time abutment group showed significantly better outcomes than repeated abutment group, as measured in the standardised differences in mean values (fixed- and random-effect model): vertical bone change (0.41, 3.23) in 6 months, (1.51, 14.81) in 12 months and (2.47, 2.47) in 3 years and soft tissue change (0.21, 0.23). No significant difference was observed in terms of probing depth and complications.ConclusionOur meta-analysis revealed that implant restoration protocol using one-time abutment is superior to repeated abutment for platform switched implant because of less bone resorption and soft tissue shifts in former. However, future randomised clinical trials should be conducted to further confirm these findings because of the small samples and the limited quality of the original research.

show abstract

“…However, when using conventional prefabricated healing abutments, the surrounding soft tissues may be unfavorable for receiving the final restorations . Knowing that an appropriate emergence profile of an implant‐supported restoration is important for optimizing hygiene and esthetics, it is fundamental to obtain harmonious soft tissue architecture around dental implants prior the final impression . In order to achieve this goal, gradual modifications by means of provisional restorations are usually needed, which demands a larger number of appointments and a longer chairside time …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…30 Knowing that an appropriate emergence profile of an implantsupported restoration is important for optimizing hygiene and esthetics, it is fundamental to obtain harmonious soft tissue architecture around dental implants prior the final impression. 26,[30][31][32] In order to achieve this goal, gradual modifications by means of provisional restorations are usually needed, 24 which demands a larger number of appointments and a longer chairside time. 30,33 During soft tissue healing, the organization of collagen fibers (after 4 weeks) and mature mucosal adhesion (after 6-8 weeks) are suggested.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peri‐implant tissue management after immediate implant placement using a customized healing abutment

Ruales‐Carrera

Pauletto

Apaza‐Bedoya

et al. 2019

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The unavoidable extraction of teeth in the esthetic area can be overcome through different treatment modalities. Recently, immediate implants appeared as a minimally invasive approach to resolving these cases; however, immediate implant loading is not always possible or indicated. In these cases, an innovative approach through customized healing abutments could be used to preserve the soft tissue contour, eliminating the need for reopening surgery and the use of provisional restorations to condition the mucosal contour. Clinical Considerations The present cases describe a simplified chairside approach to use customized healing abutments for immediate implants placed after tooth extraction in the anterior and posterior areas in order to maintain the soft tissue contours while reducing the clinical steps until delivering the final restorations. Conclusions This technique seems to be effective to guide the soft tissue healing around dental implants allowing a natural emergence profile with implant‐supported restorations, reducing the number of treatment steps. Clinical Significance The use of customized healing abutments prepares soft tissue for the prosthetic stage preserving its contours and eliminating the need for reopening surgery.

show abstract

Immediate Placement and Loading of Maxillary Single- Tooth Implants: A 3-Year Prospective Study of Marginal Bone Level

Cited by 17 publications

References 28 publications

Five‐year cohort prospective study on single implants in the esthetic area restored using one‐abutment/one‐time prosthetic approach

Five‐year cohort prospective study on single implants in the esthetic area restored using one‐abutment/one‐time prosthetic approach

One-time versus repeated abutment connection for platform-switched implant: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Peri‐implant tissue management after immediate implant placement using a customized healing abutment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About