Welfare States and Immigrant Rights 2012
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654772.003.0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immigrants’ Social Rights across Welfare States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, few studies actually disentangle how individual benefit programmes address specific social risks that might occur disproportionately among immigrants. One of the few exceptions is the work of Sainsbury and Morissens (2012). In a descriptive comparison between Denmark, Germany, France, Sweden, the United States, and the United Kingdom the authors find, in line with previous studies, that the comprehensive welfare states of the two Nordic countries perform best at lifting households of immigrants and ethnic minorities out of poverty (p. 121).…”
Section: The Benefit Generosity Hypothesissupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, few studies actually disentangle how individual benefit programmes address specific social risks that might occur disproportionately among immigrants. One of the few exceptions is the work of Sainsbury and Morissens (2012). In a descriptive comparison between Denmark, Germany, France, Sweden, the United States, and the United Kingdom the authors find, in line with previous studies, that the comprehensive welfare states of the two Nordic countries perform best at lifting households of immigrants and ethnic minorities out of poverty (p. 121).…”
Section: The Benefit Generosity Hypothesissupporting
confidence: 74%
“…It is difficult to draw general conclusions from the findings of Sainsbury and Morissens (2012). Large differences in the data collection process impede on a more substantive interpretation (p. 125).…”
Section: The Benefit Generosity Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This approach has been applied to study the effects of social welfare policies on poverty rates (see, e.g., Kenworthy, ). Other studies have evaluated how taxes and transfers affect poverty rates among specific subgroups, such as among children (see, e.g., Gornick and Jäntti, ), working‐age populations (Gornick and Milanovic, ), single parents (Maldonado and Nieuwenhuis, ), and migrant households (Sainsbury and Morissens, ). For such “redistribution studies,” the actual differences between gross and net income are of substantive interest, and both are compared within a single dataset.…”
Section: Comparing Gross and Net Income When Using The Lis Datamentioning
confidence: 99%