2018
DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immigration and the British news media: Continuity or change?

Abstract: This article examines research carried out over the last 40 years in the area of media and migration in the British context. This thematic review of more than 60 empirical studies explores how U.K. media attention to the immigration issue has fluctuated over time, but has displayed consistent negativity in its terms of reference, exclusionary features, and significant interpretative limitations, not least in the conflation of distinct types of migration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To an extent, this is neither unexpected nor a departure from analog (i.e. pre-digital) media: moves toward quantification and statistical reasoning throughout history have always involved aggregation (Desrosières, 1998), and studies into legacy media representations of migration show how “masses” of migrants predominate (Smith and Deacon, 2018). What is more, paraphrasing Haraway’s (1988) language, my results suggest migrants are simultaneously everywhere and nowhere: everywhere in the sense that migrants appear to occupy entire nation-states, and nowhere in the sense that charts tend to strip away contextual details about migrants’ varied origins and locations to focus on their quantitative stocks.…”
Section: Discussion: the Politics Of Making Migrants And Migration Vi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To an extent, this is neither unexpected nor a departure from analog (i.e. pre-digital) media: moves toward quantification and statistical reasoning throughout history have always involved aggregation (Desrosières, 1998), and studies into legacy media representations of migration show how “masses” of migrants predominate (Smith and Deacon, 2018). What is more, paraphrasing Haraway’s (1988) language, my results suggest migrants are simultaneously everywhere and nowhere: everywhere in the sense that migrants appear to occupy entire nation-states, and nowhere in the sense that charts tend to strip away contextual details about migrants’ varied origins and locations to focus on their quantitative stocks.…”
Section: Discussion: the Politics Of Making Migrants And Migration Vi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When, as late as 2010, Michael Gove – then Secretary of State for Education – dismissed the authority of professional historians who had problematised British imperial history and aimed (unsuccessfully) to impose a ‘history as celebration’ curriculum, that is, one that assumed a progressive linear history moved forward by great British ‘heroes’ and British institutions – the best in the world – he was merely reflecting a four-decades old Conservative Party’s education policy, as well as the ideological work of Conservative think tanks, politicians and newspapers (Watson, 2020). Meanwhile, tabloids kept dealing in racist tropes and ‘Euromyths’, and public television dedicated documentaries and series to Britain’s historical international beneficence (Richardson, 2004; Saeed, 2007; Smith and Deacon, 2018; van Dijk, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%