2013
DOI: 10.1002/star.201300132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobilization of α‐amylase on reactive modified fiber and its application for continuous starch hydrolysis in a packed bed bioreactor

Abstract: In this study, the enzyme α‐amylase was immobilized on reactive modified poly (ethylene terephthalate) fiber. The activities of free α‐amylase and immobilized α‐amylase were compared in a batch starch hydrolysis system. Optimum pH and Michaelis–Menten constants were determined for both free α‐amylase and immobilized α‐amylase. The immobilization shifted the optimum pH to a higher level. The Michaelis–Menten constant values (Km) of the immobilized α‐amylase and free α‐amylase were obtained as 11.94 and 6.61 mg/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase of K m and decrease of V max after immobilization showed the decrease of affinity between enzyme and substrate, which was consistent with previous reports [3,6,21,22]. This could be explained by the diffusional limitation of the substrate due to steric hindrance from the immobilizing supports, which caused lower accessibility of substrate to the active sites of the immobilized enzymes or conformational changes of the enzyme occurring in the immobilizing process which re sulted in a lower possibility of substrate-enzyme complex formation [3,8,20]. Additionally, the K m value for a-amylase immobilized on AgNP/ESM was larger than that on ESM.…”
Section: Enzyme Kinetics Of Free and Immobilized A-amylasessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The increase of K m and decrease of V max after immobilization showed the decrease of affinity between enzyme and substrate, which was consistent with previous reports [3,6,21,22]. This could be explained by the diffusional limitation of the substrate due to steric hindrance from the immobilizing supports, which caused lower accessibility of substrate to the active sites of the immobilized enzymes or conformational changes of the enzyme occurring in the immobilizing process which re sulted in a lower possibility of substrate-enzyme complex formation [3,8,20]. Additionally, the K m value for a-amylase immobilized on AgNP/ESM was larger than that on ESM.…”
Section: Enzyme Kinetics Of Free and Immobilized A-amylasessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The optimal temperature was 55°C for both free and immobilized enzymes. The unchanged optimal temperature after immobilization was also reported in previous studies [9,19,20]. When temperature was below 55°C, a-amylase immobilized on AgNP/ESM retained more of its activity relative to free and ESM-immobilized enzymes.…”
Section: Effect Of Temperature On Activitysupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is important to be careful with random immobilization techniques as they can also lead to a decrease in the catalytic activity and stability of the enzymes. Immobilization techniques must be used to stabilize enzymes against inhibitors, preventing aggregation, autolysis, or proteolysis [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. The immobilization of α-amylase can also modify the enzyme selectivity and specificity, reduce inhibitions, or be coupled to purification [ 15 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%