2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immobilization of peroxidases on glass beads: An improved alternative for phenol removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
67
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
67
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows the biocatalyst to survive longer during process conditions and allows one to operate the process at higher temperature [3]. There are many immobilization techniques available such as adsorption [4], covalent attachment [5] and entrapment [6]. Non-covalent binding processes are simple but have the disadvantage of weak binding of enzyme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows the biocatalyst to survive longer during process conditions and allows one to operate the process at higher temperature [3]. There are many immobilization techniques available such as adsorption [4], covalent attachment [5] and entrapment [6]. Non-covalent binding processes are simple but have the disadvantage of weak binding of enzyme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other popular enzymes are horseradish peroxidase and soybean peroxidase: Both enzymes were covalently immobilized onto aldehyde glass through their amine groups, and a clear protective effect of the immobilization against the enzyme inactivation by hydrogen peroxide was found [257,258].…”
Section: Improved Rigidity Of the Enzymementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel research in the area of enzyme technology has provided significant evidence and strategies that facilitate using enzymes optimally at large scale by entrapping and immobilizing [14,15]. Although enzymes entrapped in porous polymeric matrices pose inherent limitations of enzyme leaching; however by controlling the pore dimensions such leaching can be minimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%