2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune responses to borrelial VlsE IR6 peptide variants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
31
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, seropositivity for the different IR 6 peptides corresponded well to recent findings in Finnish patients with EM (Sillanpää et al, 2007). However, seropositivity for the C6 peptide was 36% at presentation in this study compared to 55% and 65% in Finnish and Slovenian patients with EM at diagnosis and to 91% in early localised LB in Dutch patients (Sillanpää et al, 2007;Smismans et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Generally, seropositivity for the different IR 6 peptides corresponded well to recent findings in Finnish patients with EM (Sillanpää et al, 2007). However, seropositivity for the C6 peptide was 36% at presentation in this study compared to 55% and 65% in Finnish and Slovenian patients with EM at diagnosis and to 91% in early localised LB in Dutch patients (Sillanpää et al, 2007;Smismans et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, seropositivity for the C6 peptide was 36% at presentation in this study compared to 55% and 65% in Finnish and Slovenian patients with EM at diagnosis and to 91% in early localised LB in Dutch patients (Sillanpää et al, 2007;Smismans et al, 2006). The variation in the C6 seropositivity rates between different studies may be related to differences in the patient material or timing of sampling.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations