The performance of ELISAs with the recombinant antigens decorin-binding protein A (DbpA), DbpB, and BBK32 (from Borrelia afzelii, B. garinii, and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto) and VlsE peptide antigen invariable region 6 (IR(6)) were evaluated in the serodiagnosis and follow-up of children with Lyme arthritis (LA). Serum samples were obtained from 52 children with clinically typical and serologically confirmed LA. In IgG ELISAs, at diagnosis, 50 samples were positive for BBK32, 51 for DbpA, 40 for DbpB, and 51 for IR(6). In the posttreatment follow-up, the rate of decline of the antibodies to the recombinant protein antigens or to IR(6) did not appear useful in the prediction of the treatment response or the clinical course of LA. Yet, IR(6) seems to have the greatest potential to be used universally in the diagnostic serology of Lyme borreliosis (LB). Alternate to that, the use of several specific borrelial antigens, in parallel, might improve the accuracy of serology for LB.
In LNB, the production of CXCL13 in CSF seems to precede antibody production. Assessment of CSF CXCL13 may improve the diagnostics for children with possible LNB.
The performances of recombinant borrelial BBK32 proteins as antigens in the serology of erythema migrans (EM) were evaluated in an ELISA. Serum samples were obtained from 75 patients from different geographic areas where three borrelial species, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, Borrelia afzelii or Borrelia garinii, cause Lyme borreliosis. Antibodies to variant BBK32 proteins were compared with anti-flagella or with anti-IR 6 peptide antibodies. In IgG ELISA at presentation of EM, 65/75 (87 %) patients had antibodies to one or more variants of BBK32, 29/75 (39 %) had antibodies to flagella and 29/75 (39 %) had antibodies to the VlsE IR 6 peptide antigen. The immunoreactivity against variant BBK32 proteins differed in patients from different geographic regions. The present results suggest that the BBK32 proteins used in combination or in parallel may improve the laboratory diagnosis of EM.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the antibody responses to different VlsE protein IR6 peptide variants and the synthetic C6 peptide in acute and convalescent (2-3 and 6 months) serum samples from Swedish patients with clinical erythema migrans (EM). Serum samples were prospectively collected from 148 patients with EM and compared to serum samples obtained from 200 healthy blood donors. The IgG responses to 3 IR6 peptide variants originating from Borrelia burgdorferi (B. burgdorferi) sensu stricto, B. garinii, and B. afzelii were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and compared to a commercial C6 peptide ELISA. Seropositivity rate in the IR6 or C6 peptide ELISAs ranged from 32% to 58% at presentation, 30-52% after 2-3 months, and 20-36% after 6 months. At presentation, positive antibodies in any of the 4 ELISAs were found in 66%. In 7/52 (13%), C6-negative EM cases, serological reaction was found to the B. burgdorferi sensu stricto-derived IR6 peptide. In patients reporting previous LB compared to those without previous LB, significantly higher seropositivity rates were noted for all IR6 peptides, but not for the C6 peptide. In the serology of EM in Europe, C6 ELISA does not seem to cover all cases. An ELISA using a mixture of B. burgdorferi sensu stricto IR6 peptide and the C6 peptide could be of value in the serodiagnosis of LB in Europe. Further studies on combinations of variant IR6 peptides and the C6 peptide in other manifestations of LB are needed to address this issue.Original Publication:Ivar Tjernberg, H. Sillanpaa, I. Seppala, I. Eliasson, Pia Forsberg and P. Lahdenne, Antibody responses to borrelia IR6 peptide variants and the C6 peptide in Swedish patients with erythema migrans, 2009, International Journal of Medical Microbiology, (299), 6, 439-446.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2008.10.006Copyright: Elsevier Science B. V. Amsterdamhttp://www.elsevier.com
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.