1981
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.1890070207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunogenicity of influenza A/USSR (H1N1) subunit vaccine in unprimed young adults

Abstract: Purified subunit vaccines (HANAflu) containing 20 microgram hemagglutinin of influenza A/USSR/90/77 (H1N1) alone or with 1-5% whole virus were compared to commercially available vaccines for reactogenicity and immunogenicity in unprimed young adults. Reactions to all vaccines were minimal. Sera from volunteers who received two intramuscular doses of vaccine or placebo were tested by hemagglutination-inhibition and neutralization tests. HANAflu with 1 microgram (5%) whole virus added was not different in immuno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas the hemagglutinin surface glycoprotein provides the main antigenic stimulus, the presence of other viral components in the vaccine, such as internal proteins or RNA, could potentiate the priming of naïve immune cells. This is suggested by studies performed about 30 years ago with more highly purified subunit influenza vaccines which showed that addition of whole virus enhanced responses to subunit vaccines in children and un-primed young adults whereas addition of whole virus provided no additional benefit for primed subjects 19 - 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the hemagglutinin surface glycoprotein provides the main antigenic stimulus, the presence of other viral components in the vaccine, such as internal proteins or RNA, could potentiate the priming of naïve immune cells. This is suggested by studies performed about 30 years ago with more highly purified subunit influenza vaccines which showed that addition of whole virus enhanced responses to subunit vaccines in children and un-primed young adults whereas addition of whole virus provided no additional benefit for primed subjects 19 - 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the hanaflu stellate vaccines were tested with and without influenza B whole virus in humans, no enhancement in antibody responses was seen although the subjects were primed adults [52]. However, when the hanaflu/whole virus concept was tested in subjects unprimed for A/NJ/76 (H1N1) and A/USSR/77 (H1N1), enhancement was demonstrated when the hanaflu stellate vaccine included some whole virus [53], [54]. The intermediate immunogenicity of an H5N1 vaccine that contained stellate structures is compatible with the reduced immunogenicity seen in unprimed subjects with the pure hanaflu “stellate” vaccines by Webster and Laver.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…differences have not always been statistically significant. In The specificity of CTL induced by vaccination was examined contrast, split-virus vaccines are less immunogenic than WVVs by testing each population of effector cells against a panel of in immunologically unprimed subjects (1,7). It is noteworthy autologous targets that had been either infected with influenza that unlike the split-virus vaccines used in all of the previous A/Taiwan (HlNl), A/Shanghai (H3N2), or B/Yamagata virus reports referenced above, the subunit vaccine in the present or mock infected with allantoic fluid alone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%