2021
DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunohistochemistry as an accurate tool for the assessment of BRAF V600E and TP53 mutations in primary and metastatic melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Karbel et al [22] reported almost perfect agreement (kappa = 1.0) for BRAF VE1 IHC interpretation with three pathologists in 53 lung cancers. Previous studies on the interobserver agreement for BRAF VE1 IHC interpretation in PTCs, melanomas, and CRCs reported moderate to perfect agreement (kappa=0.554-1.0) [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. But, in most studies, two or three pathologists interpreted the results of IHC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Karbel et al [22] reported almost perfect agreement (kappa = 1.0) for BRAF VE1 IHC interpretation with three pathologists in 53 lung cancers. Previous studies on the interobserver agreement for BRAF VE1 IHC interpretation in PTCs, melanomas, and CRCs reported moderate to perfect agreement (kappa=0.554-1.0) [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. But, in most studies, two or three pathologists interpreted the results of IHC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The BRAF VE1 IHC was known to have a sensitivity of 86%-100% and a specificity of 93-100% in detecting BRAF V600E mutation in papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs), melanomas, and colorectal cancers (CRCs) with moderate to perfect interobserver agreements [3,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Hence, National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend the BRAF VE1 IHC as a screening test for the assessment of BRAF V600E status in melanomas and CRCs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These controversies could be resolved in an improved way with larger sample sizes. Further molecular testing of other methods, such as next-generation sequencing could also be useful, as a report of inter-method discrepancy exists ( 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, cutaneous malignant melanomas occasionally have increased or aberrant p53 expression [79]. The aberrant expression does not inevitably correlate with TP53 mutations [80], and the expression of wild-type p53 may favor melanoma [81]. Interestingly, the Spitz tumor, a distinctive nevus cell neoplasm, has been reported to have a TP53-NTRK1 fusion gene [82], but its p53 immunotypes are not yet evident.…”
Section: Tp53/p53mentioning
confidence: 99%