2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12981-017-0132-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunological outcomes of Tenofovir versus Zidovudine-based regimens among people living with HIV/AIDS: a two years retrospective cohort study

Abstract: BackgroundTenofovir (TDF) based regimen was reported to have better immunological outcomes. Unfortunately, there is limited information regarding the immunologic outcome associated with this regimen in Ethiopia, as its routine utilization in this setting begun since 2013.MethodsA 2 years retrospective cohort study was conducted at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, 346 km Southwest of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A total of 280 patients’ data from September 2012 to July 2014 was extracted from records from Febru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the changes were mainly from EFV to NVP which could be explained by the fact that EFV is not recommended for women who are pregnant. On comparing the backbone,zinovudine based regimens had a higher drug substitution (aHR 2.067, 95% CI: 1.81-2.36) compared to Tenofovir.This concurs with a study conducted by [14] in Ethiopia which concluded that TDF based regimens have more efficacy that AZT based regimens. Another study in Kenya [15] shows that TDF had lower modifications of the ART treatments.Further, a study in South Africa [16] showed that TDF seemed to perform better notably with less drug substitution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Most of the changes were mainly from EFV to NVP which could be explained by the fact that EFV is not recommended for women who are pregnant. On comparing the backbone,zinovudine based regimens had a higher drug substitution (aHR 2.067, 95% CI: 1.81-2.36) compared to Tenofovir.This concurs with a study conducted by [14] in Ethiopia which concluded that TDF based regimens have more efficacy that AZT based regimens. Another study in Kenya [15] shows that TDF had lower modifications of the ART treatments.Further, a study in South Africa [16] showed that TDF seemed to perform better notably with less drug substitution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…e finding from the marginal analysis also indicated that the change in mean CD4+ count is significantly higher in AZT-based regimens. Adult immunologic studies indicated that a linear trend in CD4+ increment at the early phase of therapy is expected and it became flat with minimal CD4+ gain later after 18 th month of treatment course [29]. However, the linear trend of immunologic recovery may indicate our study was ended prematurely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Some studies showed that TDF increases immune response more than AZT. A retrospective cohort study conducted by Ayele, Jarso & Mamo (2017) for two years in Ethiopia showed that the TDF regimen had better immune improvements. A prospective study conducted by Badii & Buabeng (2018) in Ghana also showed that patients taking TDF ARVs had a higher CD4 cell increase compared to those using ZDV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%