2018
DOI: 10.1111/all.13400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunoprofile of α‐Gal‐ and B‐antigen‐specific responses differentiates red meat‐allergic patients from healthy individuals

Abstract: Red meat-allergic patients showed significantly higher α-Gal IgE, IgG , and IgG levels, reflecting a Th2 response, compared to healthy blood donors. Blood group B donors had significantly reduced antibody responses to α-Gal, due to similarities with the B-antigen, resulting in a lower risk of sensitization to α-Gal and development of red meat allergy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences could reflect the tick species, the community of microbiota living inside the ticks, or temporal changes in the tick saliva-derived factors throughout the duration of feeding, including protein changes in the saliva of lone star ticks as previously reported ( 102 105 ). Meat allergic patients show a Th2-skewed profile, as measured by higher α-gal IgE, IgG1 and IgG4 levels ( 106 ). This suggests that tick bites of affected individuals drive sensitization to α-gal by promoting Th2-mediated immune responses, possibly through induced antibody class switching by tick salivary PGE2, leading to an increase in the frequency of B cells producing α-gal-specific IgE ( 107 ).…”
Section: Ige Immune Responses In Allergymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences could reflect the tick species, the community of microbiota living inside the ticks, or temporal changes in the tick saliva-derived factors throughout the duration of feeding, including protein changes in the saliva of lone star ticks as previously reported ( 102 105 ). Meat allergic patients show a Th2-skewed profile, as measured by higher α-gal IgE, IgG1 and IgG4 levels ( 106 ). This suggests that tick bites of affected individuals drive sensitization to α-gal by promoting Th2-mediated immune responses, possibly through induced antibody class switching by tick salivary PGE2, leading to an increase in the frequency of B cells producing α-gal-specific IgE ( 107 ).…”
Section: Ige Immune Responses In Allergymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although IgG4 is often considered part of a traditional type 2 immune response, high-titer IgG4 to a-gal has not consistently been reported in individuals with a-gal syndrome. 44,45,47 Interestingly, the effect of blood type on antiea-gal immunity and incidence of infectious diseases was lately reported by Cabezas-Cruz et al, 48 indicating that susceptibility to malaria and tuberculosis correlated positively with the frequency of blood type B in endemic regions. These diseases are caused by pathogens with a-gal on their surface.…”
Section: Interactions With B Antigenmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…43,44 This finding suggests that IgE response to a-gal may result from class switch of preexisting B cells. 41,45,46 However, several questions remain regarding the mechanisms of a-gal specific IgE production from the B-cell subsets in meat allergic individuals. Although IgG4 is often considered part of a traditional type 2 immune response, high-titer IgG4 to a-gal has not consistently been reported in individuals with a-gal syndrome.…”
Section: Interactions With B Antigenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the possibility that exposure to house cats could also be a relevant factor in a-Gal sensitization, as has been suggested by some reports, we investigated a cohort from an area where ticks are very rare. 28,29 Detailed information about cat exposure, as well as IgG to Felinus domesticus 1 as a marker of exposure, was available from a population-based study in Northern Sweden that we have previously investigated for asthma. 20 In this cold and arid region that straddles the Arctic Circle ticks are rare and there has been little report of mammalian meat allergy.…”
Section: Further Evidence For a Connection With Tick Bitesmentioning
confidence: 99%