2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact behaviour of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy and non-isothermal cyclic butylene terephthalate composites manufactured by vacuum infusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking a closer look, one can see a uniform interfiber distribution and a good microimpregnation in all composites. Good fiber impregnation is observed because the low viscosity of the molten CBT facilitates the penetration of the resin through the fabric and the impregnation of intra‐bundle fibers . Nevertheless, some intrabundle voids were detected which are in line with the calculated void contents of 0.5–1.5%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking a closer look, one can see a uniform interfiber distribution and a good microimpregnation in all composites. Good fiber impregnation is observed because the low viscosity of the molten CBT facilitates the penetration of the resin through the fabric and the impregnation of intra‐bundle fibers . Nevertheless, some intrabundle voids were detected which are in line with the calculated void contents of 0.5–1.5%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Mohd Ishak et al reported void contents of <1 and 4.7% for pressure‐controlled and for displacement‐controlled conditions, respectively. Using vacuum infusion, Agirregomezkorta et al obtained a void content of 3.3%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, environmental resistance and reformability, higher fracture toughness and impact strength make textile reinforced thermoplastics more attractive for future light weight solutions than their thermoset counterparts [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Applications of textile reinforced thermoplastics, however, have been restricted constantly due to the high production cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The higher energy absorption capability of pCBT/CF was justified by its lower interlaminar shear strength (ILSS), as compared to the epoxy/CF composite. The epoxy-based composite matrix was characterized by a relatively brittle fracture, whereas the thermoplastic nature of the pCBT matrix induced delamination, which in turn improved the energy absorption capability and impact resistance 199 . Moreover, the authors used quasi-static and low energy impact tests and found that the ILSS is strain rate dependent for both composites.…”
Section: Composites With Carbon Fibresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…194 As already mentioned earlier, Yu and co-workers 76 Agirregomezkorta and associates [198][199][200][201][202] used vacuum infusion to produce woven CF fabric-reinforced pCBT composites and compared them to equally produced epoxy-based composites. The pCBT-based composite presented a higher shrinkage and void content than the epoxy-based one due to the volumetric shrinkage associated with pCBT crystallisation.…”
Section: Composites With Carbon Fibresmentioning
confidence: 99%