Impact bias or underestimation? Outcome specifications predict the direction of affective forecasting errors.

Abstract

Affective forecasts are used to anticipate the hedonic impact of future events and decide which events to pursue or avoid. We propose that because affective forecasters are more sensitive to outcome specifications of events than experiencers, the outcome specification values of an event, such as its duration, magnitude, probability, and psychological distance, can be used to predict the direction of affective forecasting errors: whether affective forecasters will overestimate or underestimate its hedonic impact. When specifications are positively correlated with the hedonic impact of an event, forecasters will overestimate the extent to which high specification values will intensify and low specification values will discount its impact. When outcome specifications are negatively correlated with its hedonic impact, forecasters will overestimate the extent to which low specification values will intensify and high specification values will discount its impact. These affective forecasting errors compound additively when multiple specifications are aligned in their impact: In Experiment 1, affective forecasters underestimated the hedonic impact of winning a smaller prize that they expected to win, and they overestimated the hedonic impact of winning a larger prize that they did not expect to win. In Experiment 2, affective forecasters underestimated the hedonic impact of a short unpleasant video about a temporally distant event, and they overestimated the hedonic impact of a long unpleasant video about a temporally near event. Experiments 3A and 3B showed that differences in the affect-richness of forecasted and experienced events underlie these differences in sensitivity to outcome specifications, therefore accounting for both the impact bias and its reversal. (PsycINFO Database Record

Bias in predicted and remembered emotion

“…Predictions diverge most from experience when they encompass emotion duration or mood. Changing appraisals of events, and attending to salient but unrepresentative features of events, can result in either over-or underestimating emotion [25,26,28]. Consistent with evidence that common cognitive processes underlie prospection and retrospection, similar patterns of accuracy and bias, and similar sources of bias, are found when people predict and remember emotion.…”

“…Recent research reveals underestimation [26][27][28], and accuracy [12,29,30], as well as overestimation [31][32][33]. To account for this variation, Buechel, Zhang, and Morewedge [26] proposed that emotional experiences are more attention absorbing and richly detailed than forecasts. As a result, forecasters attend more than experiencers to characteristics of events that are typically diagnostic of an event's hedonic impact.…”

Buying Beauty for the Long Run: (Mis)predicting Liking of Product Aesthetics

“…By systematically manipulating the level of arousal potential for the same sensory stimulus, the present research provides important insight into when and why errors in predicted liking are more or less likely to occur. This focus on how characteristics of sensory stimuli determine forecasting errors complements and extends related efforts in the affective forecasting literature in the non-sensory domain, which has examined how characteristics of events (e.g., their probability or psychological distance) differently influence their emotional impact in prospect and experience (e.g., Buechel et al 2014;Buechel, Morewedge, and Zhang 2017;Ebert and Meyvis 2014).…”

“…Most existing work on predicted and experienced hedonic value has focused on stimuli in the non-sensory domain. Specifically, research on affective forecasting suggests that in many cases, people overestimate how much and for how long products, events, and circumstances will impact their happiness and well-being (for overviews see Gilbert 2003, 2005;Buechel, Morewedge, and Zhang 2017). Research in this area has uncovered several sources for this forecasting error.…”

Greener grass or sour grapes? How people value future goals after initial failure

“…Attempting to reconcile previous findings, a recent study showed that differences in outcome specification can predict the direction of forecasting errors (Buechel, Zhang, & Morewedge, 2017).…”