2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2014.08.008
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact experiments on highly porous targets: Cavity morphology and disruption thresholds in the strength regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laboratory high-velocity impact experiments, using millimeter-to-centimeter size projectiles to study cratering in the strength regime, were performed for various targets with porosities ranging from 0% to more than 90%. The morphology and dimensions, i.e., diameter and depth, were studied for weak cemented basalt targets (Housen, 1992), sandperlite-fly ash mixture targets (Housen and Holsapple, 2003), sintered glass bead targets (Love et al, 1993;Michikami et al, 2007;Hiraoka et al, 2008;Okamoto et al, 2015; Okamoto and Nakamura 2017), cement mortar targets (Michikami et al, 2017), gypsum targets Okamoto and Nakamura, 2017), and natural porous rocks (Baldwin, et al, 2007;Kenkmann, et al, 2011;Suzuki et al, 2012;Poelchau, M. H., 2014;Flynn, et al, 2015;Okamoto and Nakamura, 2017). Table 1 summarizes the target density, porosity, strength, impact velocity, and projectile material and diameter of these experiments.…”
Section: Targets In the Strength Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Laboratory high-velocity impact experiments, using millimeter-to-centimeter size projectiles to study cratering in the strength regime, were performed for various targets with porosities ranging from 0% to more than 90%. The morphology and dimensions, i.e., diameter and depth, were studied for weak cemented basalt targets (Housen, 1992), sandperlite-fly ash mixture targets (Housen and Holsapple, 2003), sintered glass bead targets (Love et al, 1993;Michikami et al, 2007;Hiraoka et al, 2008;Okamoto et al, 2015; Okamoto and Nakamura 2017), cement mortar targets (Michikami et al, 2017), gypsum targets Okamoto and Nakamura, 2017), and natural porous rocks (Baldwin, et al, 2007;Kenkmann, et al, 2011;Suzuki et al, 2012;Poelchau, M. H., 2014;Flynn, et al, 2015;Okamoto and Nakamura, 2017). Table 1 summarizes the target density, porosity, strength, impact velocity, and projectile material and diameter of these experiments.…”
Section: Targets In the Strength Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory high-velocity impact experiments, using millimeter-to-centimeter size projectiles to study cratering in the strength regime, were performed for various targets with porosities ranging from 0% to more than 90%. The morphology and dimensions, i.e., diameter and depth, were studied for weak cemented basalt targets (Housen, 1992), sandperlite-fly ash mixture targets (Housen and Holsapple, 2003), sintered glass bead targets (Love et al, 1993;Michikami et al, 2007;Hiraoka et al, 2008;Okamoto et al, 2015;…”
Section: High-velocity Impact Cratering Experiments Of Porous Targets...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the outcome of collisional disruption of targets with high porosity, targets formed of hollow-glass beads with bulk porosity of 87% and 94% have been impacted at velocities between 1.8 and 7 km s -1 (Okamoto et al, 2015). The specific energy required for disruption was as large as several kJ/kg, which is much larger than that required for basalt targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The filamentous framework of the dust aggregate may be simulated by a very thin mesh wall surrounding the void. The hollow glass bead used in a previous study (Okamoto et al, 2015) has thin shell with a thickness of 0.95 m. Although the shell of the hollow bead is not a mesh structure, a sintered hollow glass bead target may mimic the mechanical and impact response of primitive highly porous bodies formed by the accumulation of porous dust aggregates, especially thermally evolved icy bodies with enhanced bonding between icy dust grains of ~1 m size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although laboratory experiments have provided much insight into cratering phenomena in terms of qualitative descriptions or semi-analytic expressions, including bulb-shaped tracks on porous targets 13 , crater-ray formations of impact ejecta 14 , and low-speed penetration resistance 15 17 , coupled with granular flow and compaction 18 , 19 , we still do not fully understand the cratering process, partially due to the difficulties in experimentally tracing the motions of target particles. Such limitation can be overcome through numerical simulations, e.g., by using the Soft-Sphere Discrete Element Method developed by Cundall & Strack 10 , 20 , which consequently complements our understanding of the excavation stage 12 , 21 , and the amount of ejected mass 22 , 23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%