2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2022.103492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact ice adhesion strength of stainless steel 304 as determined on a centrifuge test stand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple studies have shown a positive linear correlation between surface roughness and adhesive strength. 8,9,25,26 An increase of adhesion from 127 to 307 kPa at −10 °C was observed for R a rise from 0.5 to 2.55 μm. 5 In a previous study of Chu, the adhesive strength increased from 270 to 370 kPa, while R a ranged from 0.81 to 2.03 μm.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple studies have shown a positive linear correlation between surface roughness and adhesive strength. 8,9,25,26 An increase of adhesion from 127 to 307 kPa at −10 °C was observed for R a rise from 0.5 to 2.55 μm. 5 In a previous study of Chu, the adhesive strength increased from 270 to 370 kPa, while R a ranged from 0.81 to 2.03 μm.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The properties of ice are affected by flying and meteorological parameters such as airspeed, temperature, and liquid water content. Many studies have tracked the effects of these parameters on ice adhesion. For surface properties, existing quantitative studies focus on hydrophobicity and surface textures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low solid/liquid interfacial contact area of the frozen droplet on the functionalized surfaces results in an adhesion strength of 0.109 kPa compared with the adhesion strength of ice crystallized on the bare stainless steel mesh substrate and solid stainless steel substrate (698 kPa at À10 C). [82][83][84] Average shear force experienced by the droplet for 7 mg cm À2 ZnO/TEOS/F-POSS on 177 μm pore mesh is 2.91 μN, whereas for 14 mg cm À2 ZnO/TEOS/F-POSS on 44 μm pore mesh the force is 2.85 μN. This difference in force is primarily due to the contact angle differences between functionalized meshes, which project a lower solid angle for lower loading and higher mesh pore size.…”
Section: Delayed Ice Nucleation On Plastronic Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smoother surfaces are generally associated with lower ice adhesion, while controlled micro or nanoscale roughness can facilitate ice shedding. Techniques such as surface treatments, shot blasting, laser texturing, or hydrophobic patterns are used to optimize surface roughness for minimizing ice adhesion [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%