2014
DOI: 10.1208/s12248-014-9606-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact-Insertion Applicator Improves Reliability of Skin Penetration by Solid Microneedle Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to failure forces measured in prior studies of microneedles, this yield point is comparable to some and significantly lower than others, although direct comparison is difficult because microneedle mechanical strength depends on microneedle geometry, composition and other factors. 30,33,34,36,39,49 From a practical standpoint, however, microneedles only need to be strong enough to perform their function of penetrating skin, which the microneedles in this study were able to do.…”
Section: Mechanical Characterization Of Microneedlesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to failure forces measured in prior studies of microneedles, this yield point is comparable to some and significantly lower than others, although direct comparison is difficult because microneedle mechanical strength depends on microneedle geometry, composition and other factors. 30,33,34,36,39,49 From a practical standpoint, however, microneedles only need to be strong enough to perform their function of penetrating skin, which the microneedles in this study were able to do.…”
Section: Mechanical Characterization Of Microneedlesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…12,29 Insertion of shorter microneedles can be performed at a high velocity that allows skin penetration to occur on a timescale faster than the mechanical relaxation time of the skin. [30][31][32] Failure of microneedles due to the compressive forces present during insertion into skin has been studied experimentally and modeled. [33][34][35][36][37][38] These studies show that microneedles can be designed to insert into skin at forces substantially lower than those associated with microneedle fracture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aqueous formulations are primarily taken up by Langerhans cells in the superficial layers of the mucosal epithelium, while alternative DC populations that may be more immunogenic like interstitial DCs and plasmacytoid DCs reside deeper in the tissue at the mucosa/submucosa interface or in the submucosa (Figure ) . In studies of dermal vaccination, significantly different serum IgG titers have been generated from microneedle arrays with different needle geometry and interneedle spacing that deliver agents at different depths in the skin . Given these promising results in dermal tissue, there is a strong rationale to evaluate the effect of microneedle design parameters such as shape, dimension, and interneedle spacing on penetration of different oral mucosal tissues and the resulting immune responses.…”
Section: Microneedles Have Broad Capabilities That Could Improve Oralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest reports indicated that volunteers were able to reliably insert relatively longer MNs (> 550 µm) by hand, while shorter ones (≈ 300 µm) required the use of a spring‐loaded applicator . Further studies have appeared to confirm that while manual pressure is sufficient to insert most MNs, better reproducibility is achieved using applicators . Despite their reliability, the inclusion of an applicator device with each MN array could greatly increase the cost of commercial translation.…”
Section: Translational Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[124,125] Further studies have appeared to confirm that while manual pressure is sufficient to insert most MNs, better reproducibility is achieved using applicators. [126,127] Despite their reliability, the inclusion of an applicator device with each MN array could greatly increase the cost of commercial translation. To overcome this issue, novel methods have been explored for improving the reproducibility of the manual insertion of MNs, notably through the inclusion of a pressure-sensitive film on the back of each MN array.…”
Section: Translational Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%