2023
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.985790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of a cognitive stimulation program on the reading comprehension of children in primary education

Abstract: IntroductionAt present, numerous studies can be found in which influences and relationships between the principal executive functions, reading comprehension, and academic performance associated with reading are reported. However, there is still a lack of convergence regarding the impact of computerized cognitive training on children’s executive development and its transfer in academic reading performance and comprehension of written texts.MethodsThis study analyzes the effect of implementing a cognitive stimul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the method described in the previous section, a total of 16 articles were selected, six of which implemented training in verbal and visuospatial working memory [44,53,[124][125][126][127], one focused on verbal working memory interventions [33], two specifically targeted visuospatial working memory development [34,128], and two stimulated central working memory or did not specify the specific working memory skill they targeted [70,129]. It is noteworthy that two studies conducted combined training of working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility [130] or working memory and inhibitory control [19], and only one of the selected studies addressed inhibitory control training individually [34]. Similarly, two of the selected studies carried out combined training of executive functions and reading processes simultaneously [62,71], while only one combined training in working memory with mathematical skills [101].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Following the method described in the previous section, a total of 16 articles were selected, six of which implemented training in verbal and visuospatial working memory [44,53,[124][125][126][127], one focused on verbal working memory interventions [33], two specifically targeted visuospatial working memory development [34,128], and two stimulated central working memory or did not specify the specific working memory skill they targeted [70,129]. It is noteworthy that two studies conducted combined training of working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility [130] or working memory and inhibitory control [19], and only one of the selected studies addressed inhibitory control training individually [34]. Similarly, two of the selected studies carried out combined training of executive functions and reading processes simultaneously [62,71], while only one combined training in working memory with mathematical skills [101].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Far transfer can also be observed in these variables, as after-training improvements can be observed in reading speed and fluency in children from low socioeconomic contexts, with moderate effect sizes (d = 0.61), but not in children from high socioeconomic contexts [19]. Benefits in reading comprehension are also found [130], with moderate effect sizes (η p 2 = 0.071), after a controlled intervention with a validated commercial computerized cognitive training platform (CogniFit Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA). However, Weissheimer et al [19] did not find a significant impact of the training program on reading comprehension in children after training, regardless of the socioeconomic context of the participants.…”
Section: Transfer Of Combined Working Memory and Inhibitory Control I...mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations