2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of a semi-industrial coke processing plant in the surrounding surface soil

Abstract: Soil pollution by anthropogenic activities is an important environmental issue especially in industrialized countries. The objective of this study is to evaluate the environmental impact of a coal conversion plant on the surrounding soil by measuring the spatial distribution of particulate organic carbon and determining the concentration of trace elements (part I) and PAHs (part II).The results indicate that the surface soil present an increase in the content of organic particulates with values exceeding 80% v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also observed significant changes in coal-related trace element levels (As and S) at the CSN monitor nearest the coking plant. Similar air pollution findings have been reported in studies in Europe and Asia, identifying elevated levels of SO 2 and particulate matter arsenic, sulfate in the proximity of coking plants (Khare and Baruah 2011, Díaz-Somoano et al 2012, Mu et al 2012, Zajusz-Zubek et al 2017.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We also observed significant changes in coal-related trace element levels (As and S) at the CSN monitor nearest the coking plant. Similar air pollution findings have been reported in studies in Europe and Asia, identifying elevated levels of SO 2 and particulate matter arsenic, sulfate in the proximity of coking plants (Khare and Baruah 2011, Díaz-Somoano et al 2012, Mu et al 2012, Zajusz-Zubek et al 2017.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These gypsum samples have been previously characterized by the authors [21]. The soil samples were collected from the surrounding area of a coking plant [26]. PUSH3 and FAR2 were taken from points close to, and outside, the area of greatest activity of the plant, respectively, whereas TDIST1 was sampled at the point of maximum mercury concentration [27].…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%