2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2014.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of a woody biochar on properties of a sandy loam soil and spring barley during a two-year field experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
68
1
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
8
68
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have reported no yield effect (Cornelissen et al, 2013;Uzoma et al, 2011;Nelissen et al, 2015;Subedi et al, 2016aSubedi et al, , 2016bNielsen et al, 2014;Tammeorg et al, 2014;Suddick and Six, 2013;Schmidt et al, 2014;Bass et al, 2016). Conversly, few studies have instead described reduced crop yields (Deenik et al, 2010;Baronti et al, 2010;Marks et al, 2014;Nelissen et al, 2014;Bass et al, 2016;Butnan et al, 2015;Laghari et al, 2015).…”
Section: Biochar Effects On Crop Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others have reported no yield effect (Cornelissen et al, 2013;Uzoma et al, 2011;Nelissen et al, 2015;Subedi et al, 2016aSubedi et al, , 2016bNielsen et al, 2014;Tammeorg et al, 2014;Suddick and Six, 2013;Schmidt et al, 2014;Bass et al, 2016). Conversly, few studies have instead described reduced crop yields (Deenik et al, 2010;Baronti et al, 2010;Marks et al, 2014;Nelissen et al, 2014;Bass et al, 2016;Butnan et al, 2015;Laghari et al, 2015).…”
Section: Biochar Effects On Crop Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Schmidt et al (2014) reported neither a grape yield nor quality effect after wood BC was applied to Swiss vineyard soils during a four-year field trial. A two-year field study in Belgian sandy soil with sub-acidic pH by Nelissen et al (2015) also found no effect on either spring barley or winter rye crop yields after wood BC application (22 t ha −1 ). Jones et al (2012) conducted an open field experiment in the UK and found no effect on maize yield in the first year of application on a near-neutral pH sandy clay-loam soil, but observed a 30% increase in hay grass yield in the second and third years.…”
Section: Interaction With Crop Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging data have shown that biochar used as soil amendment remarkably influences the physical, chemical, and microbiological properties of the soil. These influences include reducing soil bulk density, improving soil porosity and aggregation, increasing water holding capacity and water availability (Nelissen et al 2015;Zhang et al 2016), increasing soil pH, decreasing the toxicity of Al 3+ and Mn 2+ in acidic soil, enhancing the soil cation exchange capacity (CEC), increasing nutrient availability and nutrient use efficiency (Dong et al 2013;Yuan et al 2016), increasing gram negative bacteria (G -) and actinomycetes abundance, and reducing gram positive bacteria (G + ) abundance (Luo 2012). Both field and pot trials in tropical, subtropical, and temperate zones have shown that biochar soil amendment induces major increases in the crop yields of cereals, legumes, and tubers (Biederman and Harpole 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nelissen et al [8] reported enhanced WHC in sandy loam soil in response to biochar incorporation. The biochar incorporation increases the WHC due to the reduction of bulk density and the enhancement of porosity in soils.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biochar incorporation increases the WHC due to the reduction of bulk density and the enhancement of porosity in soils. In the long term, biochar acts as a binding material to form stable microaggregates [8,61]. These microaggregates facilitate the formation of capillaries in the soil system [62] and thereby increase the water retention [63].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%