2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of acquisition parameters on dose and image quality optimisation in paediatric pelvis radiography—A phantom study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue with identifying tissue using this method is that it’s specific to a particular energy(6). The Hounsfield Unit (HU) values for human tissues have been extensively studied, with muscular tissue ranging from 40 to 44 according to White et al 1989 (5), 60 (±) 30 according to Sirtoli et al 2017 (7) y 54 (±) 7 according to Niebuhr et al 2019(8); For cancellous bone tissue according to Mohammed et al, 2019, of 262(9) and 265 according to Sirtoli et al, 2017(7); For cortical bone tissue, 1454 according to Abdullah et al, 2018(10) and 819 (±) 211 according to Niebuhr et al, 2016(11); For adipose tissue, from -95 to -55 according to Woodard & White, 1986. (12) and Niebuhr et al, 2016(11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue with identifying tissue using this method is that it’s specific to a particular energy(6). The Hounsfield Unit (HU) values for human tissues have been extensively studied, with muscular tissue ranging from 40 to 44 according to White et al 1989 (5), 60 (±) 30 according to Sirtoli et al 2017 (7) y 54 (±) 7 according to Niebuhr et al 2019(8); For cancellous bone tissue according to Mohammed et al, 2019, of 262(9) and 265 according to Sirtoli et al, 2017(7); For cortical bone tissue, 1454 according to Abdullah et al, 2018(10) and 819 (±) 211 according to Niebuhr et al, 2016(11); For adipose tissue, from -95 to -55 according to Woodard & White, 1986. (12) and Niebuhr et al, 2016(11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, their higher cost puts some limitations on their wider availability in the hospital environment. Previous radiography dose optimisation studies used different phantom types including anthropomorphic phantoms [13,14], in-house developed phantoms [10][11][12][13][14][15] and quality control phantoms (e.g. CDRAD phantom and Primus-L phantom) [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children were used in studies on dose optimization and image quality by altering parameters, one of which was tube current-time. Radiation exposure is monitored with a dosimeter [25] and used to conduct an assessment of image quality together with the AEC variation [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%