1999
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199911270-00027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Acute Rejection Therapy on Infections and Malignancies in Renal Transplant Recipients

Abstract: In renal transplant recipients the risk of infections and lymphoma increases with increasing immunosuppression and hence mortality and morbidity associated with it. When adding a potent immunosuppressive agent to rescue a kidney one needs to consider the serious and at times fatal side effects given the modest beneficial effect on long-term outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
56
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for the high incidence of cancer in these individuals, including patients with organ transplant, are unknown, but have been postulated to include impaired immune surveillance, viral infections, or the direct effects of immunosuppressive agents (2,4,5). Nevertheless, some clues to the mechanisms underlying the development of posttransplantation cancer have recently emerged from clinical findings, including the observation that transplant patients receiving the mTOR 2 inhibitor rapamycin (RAPA) do not develop cancer at the same rate as those receiving other immunosuppressive agents such as calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (5)(6)(7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for the high incidence of cancer in these individuals, including patients with organ transplant, are unknown, but have been postulated to include impaired immune surveillance, viral infections, or the direct effects of immunosuppressive agents (2,4,5). Nevertheless, some clues to the mechanisms underlying the development of posttransplantation cancer have recently emerged from clinical findings, including the observation that transplant patients receiving the mTOR 2 inhibitor rapamycin (RAPA) do not develop cancer at the same rate as those receiving other immunosuppressive agents such as calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (5)(6)(7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,9 Nevertheless, recent studies clearly identified a major association between the use of CNI and the development and recurrence of different types of cancer in both transplant and nontransplant patients. 10 -14 The immunosuppressive effect of CNI may result in impaired immune surveillance for neoplastic cells 15,16 and may increase susceptibility to oncogenic viral infections. 12,17 CNI may also directly cause DNA damage to cells and interfere with normal DNA repair mechanisms 18 ; however, independent of these effects, it has been found that commonly used CNI cyclosporine (CsA) and FK506 may promote tumor growth through the induced expression of different genes, including TGF-␤, IL-10, and angiogenic cytokines (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNI levels should be monitored closely in the setting of acute rejection, as nephrotoxicity is more common. Moreover, in the setting of antibody-depleting therapy, patients should be monitored closely for infectious complications [25]. Graft survival is negatively impacted by episodes of acute rejection [26].…”
Section: Acute Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%