Impact of adult weight management interventions on mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Jones, Rebecca; Lawlor, Emma; Griffin, Simon J.; Sluijs, Esther M. F. van; Ahern, Amy L

doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031857

Cited by 9 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This review adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) reporting 29 . Full details of the methods were reported in the published protocol 30 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two‐stage screening was completed in duplicate, with a third reviewer resolving discrepancies 30 . We contacted study authors ( n = 2) to resolve any uncertainties about eligibility.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…29 Full details of the methods were reported in the published protocol. 30 Outcomes reported at intervention-end and at 12 months from baseline were extracted, regardless of intervention duration. We chose these a priori defined outcomes as they were deemed to be the most relevant, were most frequently reported in previous relevant literature, represented the most prevalent mental health conditions and provided the most comprehensive insight to date into mental health impacts of behavioural weight management interventions.…”

Section: This Review Adheres To Preferred Reporting Items For Systematicmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The impact of adult behavioural weight management interventions on mental health: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary There is good evidence that behavioural weight management interventions improve physical health; however, the impact on mental health remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of behavioural weight management interventions on mental health‐related outcomes in adults with overweight or obesity at intervention‐end and 12 months from baseline. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cluster RCTs of adult behavioural weight loss interventions reporting affect, anxiety, binge eating, body image, depression, emotional eating, quality of life, self‐esteem and stress. We searched seven databases from inception to 7 May 2019 and included 43 articles reporting 42 RCTs. Eighteen studies were deemed to be at high risk of bias. We conducted random‐effects meta‐analyses, stratified analyses and meta‐regression using Stata. Interventions generated greater improvements than comparators for depression, mental health‐related quality of life and self‐efficacy at intervention‐end and 12 months from baseline. There was no difference between groups for anxiety, overall quality of life, self‐esteem or stress at intervention‐end. There was insufficient evidence to assess the impact on anxiety, binge eating, body image, emotional eating, affect, life satisfaction, self‐esteem or stress at intervention‐end and/or 12 months from baseline. Although evidence suggests that interventions benefit some aspects of mental health, high‐quality, transparently reported RCTs measuring a range of mental health outcomes over longer durations are required to strengthen the evidence base.

show abstract

“…This review adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) reporting 29 . Full details of the methods were reported in the published protocol 30 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two‐stage screening was completed in duplicate, with a third reviewer resolving discrepancies 30 . We contacted study authors ( n = 2) to resolve any uncertainties about eligibility.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: This Review Adheres To Preferred Reporting Items For Systematicmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The impact of adult behavioural weight management interventions on mental health: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To ensure a right comprehension of heterogeneity, χ 2 will be completed with I² statistics particularly relevant when studies have small sample size or are few in numbers. Heterogeneity will be categorised as follows 72 :…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

How much do we know about the effectiveness of warm-up intervention on work related musculoskeletal disorders, physical and psychosocial functions: protocol for a systematic review

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionWork-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are a growing worldwide burden and effective interventions to prevent them are needed. Physical activity at the workplace is now recognised as a relevant component of WMSDs prevention. Along these lines, warm-up interventions are now offered in a large number of companies to manage WMSDs. Although benefits of warm-up have been previously documented in sports context, to the best of our knowledge, the effectiveness of such intervention in workplaces still remains to be established. Within this context, the aim of the present review is to identify from published literature the available evidence regarding the effects of warm-up on WMSDs and physical and psychosocial functions.MethodsThe following electronic databases will be searched (from inception onwards to June 2020): Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (Medline), Web of Science and Physiotherapy Evidence Database. Randomised and non-randomised controlled studies will be included in this review. Participants should be adult employees without specific comorbidities. Interventions should include a warm-up physical intervention in real-workplaces. The primary outcomes will be pain, discomfort or fatigue. The secondary outcomes will be job control or motivation at work. This review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and two team members will independently screen all citations, full-text articles and abstract data. A systematic narrative synthesis will be provided with information presented in the text and tables to summarise the characteristics and findings of the included studies.Ethics and disseminationThe approval of an ethical committee is not required. All the included studies will comply with the current ethical standards. The results of this review will summarise the effects of warm-up intervention on WMSDs, physical or psychosocial functions. This information could help professionals in decision making related to the use of these interventions to prevent WMSDs. Findings will be disseminated to academic audiences through peer-reviewed publications, as well as to policy-makers.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019137211.

show abstract

“…Regarding dichotomous/categorical variables, the treatment effect will be calculated using the relative risk (RR) with 95% CI [64][65][66][67] . Since the number of included studies is greater than 5 65 and when these studies are considered as sufficiently homogeneous, outcome data will be synthesized using a random effect meta-analysis 53,66,68,69 . If meta-analysis is not possible due to heterogeneity or if we are unable to pool the outcomes a narrative synthesis will be performed using text and table formats.…”

Section: Measures Of Treatment Effectmentioning

confidence: 99%

How much do we know about the effectiveness of warm-up intervention on work related musculoskeletal disorders, physical and psychosocial functions: protocol for a systematic review

Larinier

Balaguier

Vuillerme

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are a growing worldwide burden and effective interventions to prevent them are needed. Physical activity at the workplace is now recognized as a relevant component of WMSDs prevention. To ensure feasibility and sustainability of workplace physical activity programs, there is a clear need to implement interventions that do not take a large amount of time and that are easy to integrate in daily workplace routines. Along these lines, warm-up interventions are now offered in a large number of companies to manage WMSDs. Although benefits of warm-up have been previously documented in sports context, to the best of our knowledge, the effectiveness of such intervention in workplaces still remains to be established. Within this context, the aim of the present review is to identify from published literature the available evidence regarding the effects of warm-up on WMSDs and physical and psychosocial functions. Methods We will search the following electronic databases (from inception onwards): MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CENTRAL). Randomized and non-randomized controlled studies will be included in this review. Participants of the included studies should be adults employees without specific comorbidities. Interventions should include a warm-up physical intervention in real-workplaces. The primary outcomes will be pain, discomfort or fatigue. The secondary outcomes will be job control or motivation at work. This review will follow the PRISMA guidelines and two team members will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. Two team members will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. The study risk of bias and strength of the body of evidence will be appraised using appropriate tools. A systematic narrative synthesis will be provided with information presented in the text and tables to summarize and explain the characteristics and findings of the included studies. The narrative synthesis will explore the relationship and findings both within and between the included studies. This review will include adult employees (18 years of age or older) and will exclude adults with speciﬁc comorbidities or diseases (such as diabetes, arthritis, cancer, stroke) and/or special populations (pregnant, severe or rare physical disability, or cognitive disability). Discussion This review will summarize the evidence on the effects of effects of warm-up intervention on WMSDs, physical or psychosocial functions. This information could help professionals and researchers in decision-making related to the use of warm-up intervention to prevent WMSDs and their adverse consequences. This review will further identify gaps in knowledge in this field that could be addressed in forthcoming studies. Registration This protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019137211)

show abstract

Impact of adult weight management interventions on mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Cited by 9 publications

References 43 publications

The impact of adult behavioural weight management interventions on mental health: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

The impact of adult behavioural weight management interventions on mental health: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

How much do we know about the effectiveness of warm-up intervention on work related musculoskeletal disorders, physical and psychosocial functions: protocol for a systematic review

How much do we know about the effectiveness of warm-up intervention on work related musculoskeletal disorders, physical and psychosocial functions: protocol for a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About