2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1047-8310(02)00051-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of advanced manufacturing technology on organizational structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our final synthesis provides a dynamic view of barriers and enablers, distinguishing them between multiphase and stage-specific categories, and reporting the higher or lower relevance by stage. This is particularly evident for capability enablers such as AMT project management: planning and communicating AMT objectives, may reduce barriers linked to installation (Ghani et al, 2002;Rahman et al, 2009). We also conclude that this dynamic view is critical to uncover potential sub-stages of the adoption process into more clearly defined timelines (Chen and Small, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our final synthesis provides a dynamic view of barriers and enablers, distinguishing them between multiphase and stage-specific categories, and reporting the higher or lower relevance by stage. This is particularly evident for capability enablers such as AMT project management: planning and communicating AMT objectives, may reduce barriers linked to installation (Ghani et al, 2002;Rahman et al, 2009). We also conclude that this dynamic view is critical to uncover potential sub-stages of the adoption process into more clearly defined timelines (Chen and Small, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…process optimisation practices) as a stage-specific enabler. We found lack of significant evidence of operational and workflow improvements occurring before installation (Efstathiades, 2000), whilst all major actions took place between installation and postinstallation changes (Efstathiades et al, 2002;Ghani et al, 2002;Machuca et al, 2004;Szalavetz et al, 2019). Thus, this enabler was primarily significant during postinstallation, where mutual adaptation of the organisation and technology occurs, and it was of little importance within set-up and installation (Efstathiades et al, 2000).…”
Section: Summary Of Barriers and Enablersmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The firm's organizational (formal vs. informal) structure can profoundly impact employees' daily roles and responsibilities within an organization. The organizational structure can be considered the formal allocation of professional roles and administrative mechanisms to control and integrate work activities [100]. Understanding the impact of the organizational structure on benefit realization can be a tedious task.…”
Section: Organic Firm Structure and Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementing AMT in the current globalized environment is one of the biggest challenges that companies are facing, since changes are required to be reflected in the organizational structure and work [15], which means an alteration in the status quo, a threat to people's interests in their jobs, and in the established way of doing certain tasks. Ordoobadi [16] makes two observations when analyzing the stages of the AMT adoption process, where the previous barriers have been reported, as well as the manufacturers' inability to recognize the potential benefits that are offered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%