2020
DOI: 10.1109/tmrb.2020.2977003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Aging and Cognitive Mechanisms on High-Speed Motor Activation Patterns: Evidence From an Orthoptera-Robot Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…STAC (Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition) suggests that pervasive increased frontal activation with age is a marker of an adaptive brain, which engages in cognitive compensation in response to the challenges posed by declining neural structures and function [34]. One evidence from an orthoptera-robot interaction shows that cognitive decline does not occur in locusts with age [35], whereas motor impairments occur more frequently with age. This means that if the exoskeleton movement is controlled by collecting EEG signals, which has the advantages of not being easily affected by the physical condition of the wearer and reducing the time delay in man-machine coupling movement, this will be more in line with the needs of the elderly or disabled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STAC (Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition) suggests that pervasive increased frontal activation with age is a marker of an adaptive brain, which engages in cognitive compensation in response to the challenges posed by declining neural structures and function [34]. One evidence from an orthoptera-robot interaction shows that cognitive decline does not occur in locusts with age [35], whereas motor impairments occur more frequently with age. This means that if the exoskeleton movement is controlled by collecting EEG signals, which has the advantages of not being easily affected by the physical condition of the wearer and reducing the time delay in man-machine coupling movement, this will be more in line with the needs of the elderly or disabled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one may be tempted to answer “yes” to question B, thus excluding cases 2 and 3 from the interactive biorobotics category. Indeed, in the two studies, the robot replaces a zebrafish and a starling, respectively, i.e., a conspecific of the target system [while, in case study 2 and in other prey-predator studies such as Polverino et al ( 2019 ), and Romano et al ( 2020a ) the robot replaces an individual of a different species]. For this reason, one may be tempted to believe that the robot replaces the target system: the target system is the zebrafish and the starling, respectively, and the robot replaces a zebrafish and a starling, respectively.…”
Section: The Methodsological Novelty Of Interactive Bioroboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 See (Martins et al, 2005 ; Fernández-Juricic et al, 2006 ; Halloy et al, 2007 ; Ord and Stamps, 2008 ; Taylor et al, 2008 ; Partan et al, 2011 ; Romano et al, 2019a , 2020a ). …”
unclassified
“…Jumps deviating more than 15° with respect to the plane perpendicular to the axis of the camera lens were let out in order to limit the difference between the actual and perceived takeoff angle (Baker and Cooter, 1979 ). A HotShot 512 SC high speed video camera (NAC Image Technology, Simi Valley, CA, USA), with maximum frame rate up to 200, 000 fps, was used to record the takeoff phase videos at a rate of 1000 fps (Romano et al, 2018 , 2020 ; Mo et al, 2020 ). Sequential images with a resolution of 512 × 512 pixels were stored in the camera internal memory, and then downloaded for data analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%