Impact of agricultural supports on competitiveness of agricultural products

Arısoy, Hasan

doi:10.17221/416/2019-agricecon

Cited by 18 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Government policy support is an important reflection of a region’s developmental advantage. Local government policies can directly affect farmers’ planting processes, the market, and the development of local apple industries [ 53 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The concept of sustainable development offers a possible solution to the challenges humans face in terms of survival, development, and the pursuit of a high quality of life [ 1 ]. In the context of industry, sustainable competitiveness refers to the ability of an industry in one area, compared with the same type industry in other areas [ 2 , 3 ], to accrue and optimize resources and production factors to meet consumers’ needs and to survive and develop [ 4 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Competitiveness and sustainable development of Chinableapple industry

Sun

Deng²,

Yong-hua³

et al. 2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agriculture faces a contradiction between sustainable resource utilization and maintaining market competitiveness. As a major agricultural product, the sustainability and competitiveness of the apple industry have become important topics. This study analyzes the competitiveness of China’s apple industry and the factors affecting it. Using 2004 and 2018 data for eight Chinese provinces, principal component analysis and spatial autocorrelation are used to examine competitiveness in terms of five aspects: market, production, technology, organization, and environment. The results indicate that Shandong, Shaanxi, and Gansu were the most competitive during the study period while Hebei, Henan, and Ningxia lagged behind. Regional differences are obvious, with Shandong in particular showing a clear competitive advantage. Although no spatial agglomeration is observed in China’s apple industry, with ongoing industrial development, local spatial correlations in the five aspects of competitiveness in the eight provinces have been increasing and gradually stabilizing. This study’s findings suggest that improved scientific production, reasonable capital investment, and an established industrial chain are needed to promote local agriculture, economic development, and the central role of the apple industry.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Competitiveness and sustainable development of Chinableapple industry

Sun

Deng²,

Yong-hua³

et al. 2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The author Arisoy (2020) especially emphasizes the importance of the social and economic function of agriculture from the aspect of creating the national income of the country and providing food for the population. Therefore, agriculture has been supported in every society since ancient times with the application of all precautionary measures for agricultural activities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of agriculture in the economic structure of Serbia and budget support for rural development of Kladovo municipality

Grujić-Vučkovski¹,

Simonović²,

Ćurčić³

et al. 2022

Ekonomika poljoprivrede

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of writing the paper is the situation in agriculture in Serbia and the municipality of Kladovo, as well as the importance it achieves in the economic structure. At the level of Serbia, the importance of agriculture, forestry and fisheries (AFF) is analyzed through their contribution to gross domestic product (GDP) creation from 2016 to 2020, while for the municipality level the importance is determined by the amount of funds allocated in the local self-government unit (LSU) for the needs of agriculture from 2018 to 2020. The obtained results indicate a high share of AFF in GDP creation (6.3% during 2020) and a low share of budget funds in the total budget of the municipality for support of rural development (2.34% in 2020). The aim of this paper is to analyze the possibilities for further development of agriculture in the Republic and the Municipality. The paper uses methods of critical analysis of relevant literature, as well as descriptions for interpreting the results obtained by empirical research.

show abstract

“…However, it still has many social, economic and environmental functions [1,2]. Agriculture contributes to generating national income, absorbs considerable workforce resources, gives shape to foreign trade, supplies food to the society and raw materials to industry, and fulfils essential environmental functions [3,4]. Therefore, in all countries, the competitiveness of this sector is significant both in relation to other sectors and other countries.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Competitiveness of Agriculture in EU Member States According to the Competitiveness Pyramid Model

Nowak

Różańska-Boczula

2021

Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Agriculture in the European Union is highly differentiated, and one of the objectives of the Common Agricultural Policy is to improve agricultural competitiveness. Therefore, surveys regarding the competitiveness of agriculture and grouping countries of the European Union (EU) according to similar characteristics of agriculture are very valuable. They help make strategic decisions concerning the agricultural sector. This paper aims to evaluate the agricultural competitiveness of EU member states in 2010–2019. Data used is derived from the Eurostat and FADN (Farm Accountancy Data Network). The study employed a competitiveness pyramid model based on two groups of factors–competitiveness sources (bottom of the pyramid) and competitiveness effects. Partial components allocated to the groups mentioned above of factors were used to calculate a synthetic measure to determine the level of agricultural competitiveness in respective countries. The studies revealed that EU agriculture varies both in terms of resources and relationships between production factors, as well as the efficiency of their utilization. A clear difference in the level of competitiveness occurred between old and new member states, although some new countries ranked relatively high in terms of competitiveness sources (Czechia and Poland). Belgium scored highest for the synthetic measure of agricultural competitiveness in 2010–2019, and Cyprus had the lowest. It was demonstrated that human resources were of utmost importance in the structure of competitiveness sources. In turn, the average holding area determined the management conditions to the highest extent.

show abstract

Impact of agricultural supports on competitiveness of agricultural products

Cited by 18 publications

References 20 publications

Competitiveness and sustainable development of Chinableapple industry

Competitiveness and sustainable development of Chinableapple industry

The role of agriculture in the economic structure of Serbia and budget support for rural development of Kladovo municipality

The Competitiveness of Agriculture in EU Member States According to the Competitiveness Pyramid Model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About