2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of binary social status with hierarchical punishment on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Active mechanisms include those in which cooperative individuals behave conditionally to avoid free-riding-for instance, by determining whether to cooperate based on others' shared genes [43], reputations [44][45][46][47], tags [48], or wealth [49][50][51]. Such active mechanisms also include conditional behavior either to sanction defection (e.g., via punishment [14,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59], reciprocating defection with defection [36,60], or discontinuing play [61][62][63]) or to repay cooperation (e.g., via reciprocal altruism and rewards [60,64,65]). An adjacent literature, moreover, has recently generalized from the problem of cooperation to consider moral preferences more widely [66] and ofers a new active mechanism for study in the literature on cooperation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active mechanisms include those in which cooperative individuals behave conditionally to avoid free-riding-for instance, by determining whether to cooperate based on others' shared genes [43], reputations [44][45][46][47], tags [48], or wealth [49][50][51]. Such active mechanisms also include conditional behavior either to sanction defection (e.g., via punishment [14,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59], reciprocating defection with defection [36,60], or discontinuing play [61][62][63]) or to repay cooperation (e.g., via reciprocal altruism and rewards [60,64,65]). An adjacent literature, moreover, has recently generalized from the problem of cooperation to consider moral preferences more widely [66] and ofers a new active mechanism for study in the literature on cooperation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%