2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Birth Seasonality on Dynamics of Acute Immunizing Infections in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract: We analyze the impact of birth seasonality (seasonal oscillations in the birth rate) on the dynamics of acute, immunizing childhood infectious diseases. Previous research has explored the effect of human birth seasonality on infectious disease dynamics using parameters appropriate for the developed world. We build on this work by including in our analysis an extended range of baseline birth rates and amplitudes, which correspond to developing world settings. Additionally, our analysis accounts for seasonal for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been found in high-income settings, but in contrast to other African countries, rubella transmission was strongly positively related to school term times (t test, t = −3.6681, df = 80.505, P < 1e-3 for provinces excluding the Northeastern province where power for analysis was weak); transmission was not significantly correlated with rainfall (mean correlation coefficient, −0.13; 95% quantile interval, −0.34, 0.07, P > 0.2, excluding the Northeastern province; Fig. S3 and Table S1) (1,13,27,28). There was also a strong positive relationship with province-level population flux in the previous month normalized for each province (mean correlation coefficient, 0.38; 95% quantile interval, 0.18, 0.55, P < 1e-3, excluding the Northeastern province).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been found in high-income settings, but in contrast to other African countries, rubella transmission was strongly positively related to school term times (t test, t = −3.6681, df = 80.505, P < 1e-3 for provinces excluding the Northeastern province where power for analysis was weak); transmission was not significantly correlated with rainfall (mean correlation coefficient, −0.13; 95% quantile interval, −0.34, 0.07, P > 0.2, excluding the Northeastern province; Fig. S3 and Table S1) (1,13,27,28). There was also a strong positive relationship with province-level population flux in the previous month normalized for each province (mean correlation coefficient, 0.38; 95% quantile interval, 0.18, 0.55, P < 1e-3, excluding the Northeastern province).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these settings, our findings have the potential to explain some of the spatial and temporal variation observed in the periodicity of diseases such as measles, rotavirus and polio; and present a promising avenue for future research. Indeed, a recent study of birth seasonality across developing countries found that the timing of the birth peak influences epidemic timing, and a high birth rate magnifies the effect of birth seasonality on measles epidemics [59]. Although our study-focused exclusively on measles epidemiologysuggests that high amplitude birth seasonality is required to alter disease incidence, we predict that lower birth amplitudes may have a dynamical effect when coupled with a higher mean birth rate or for childhood diseases with longer infectious periods that may exhibit less frequency-locking with seasonal transmission [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The redistribution assumes that not knowing the month of the birth is unassociated with the actual birth month. Considering seasonality in birth (Dorélien 2016;Dorélien, Ballesteros, and Grenfell 2013), a redistribution proportional to reported birth month can introduce another bias, depending on the month in which the two-year reference period starts, as explained further below. Table 5 shows the total number of births falling in the two-year reference period after the adjustment.…”
Section: Figure 3: Percent Of Excess January Births Out Of Total Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%