2015 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.2015.7409831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of buffer leakage on intrinsic reliability of 650V AlGaN/GaN HEMTs

Abstract: The role of buffer traps (identified as C N acceptors through current DLTS) in the off-state leakage and dynamic Ron of 650V rated GaN-on-Si power devices is investigated. The dynamic Ron is strongly voltage-dependent, due to the interplay between the dynamic properties of the C N traps and the presence of space-charge limited current components. This results in a complete suppression of dyn Ron degradation under HTRB conditions between 420V and 850V.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…V TFL is the voltage at which the traps in the buffer are ionized, so the quasi-Fermi level is de-pinned and moves up to the band-edge, hence the steep increase in current with voltage (J~V n behavior). The traps are identified using current DLTS as C-atoms on an N-site at E v +0.85eV (8,9). Above V TFL , the vertical field becomes large enough to stimulate field-enhanced Poole-Frenkel current conduction (9,11) which allows the charge in the C N acceptors to leak away.…”
Section: Leakage and Charge Storage In The Buffer Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…V TFL is the voltage at which the traps in the buffer are ionized, so the quasi-Fermi level is de-pinned and moves up to the band-edge, hence the steep increase in current with voltage (J~V n behavior). The traps are identified using current DLTS as C-atoms on an N-site at E v +0.85eV (8,9). Above V TFL , the vertical field becomes large enough to stimulate field-enhanced Poole-Frenkel current conduction (9,11) which allows the charge in the C N acceptors to leak away.…”
Section: Leakage and Charge Storage In The Buffer Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the buffer epi stack for off-state stress of 600V GaN-on-Si devices is discussed in (7), but without re-porting any voltage acceleration data or model. In (8), the role of space charge limited (SCL) buffer current in the dyn Ron and degradation under HTRB stress is discussed. However, no voltage-accelerated degradation under HTRB stress between 420V and 850V is observed, which is explained by the GaN buffer stack becoming resistive above a certain critical voltage (trap filling level V TFL ), allowing the trapped charge to leak away.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the case of normally-off transistors, the exposure to high drain bias in the off-state can trigger further trapping processes, due to the filling of surface states [8], to defects located in the (Cdoped) buffer [6], or to the injection of electrons from the substrate [38]. These trapping processes are not specific for p-GaN gate devices, and their discussion is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Charge Trapping Processes Related To the P-gan Gatementioning
confidence: 97%
“…When the transistor is in the off-state (condition (1) in Figure 1), a high drain-source voltage is applied to the HEMT. The high resulting field ( Figure 2) may favor charge trapping mechanisms, including the filling/depletion of defects located in the C-doped buffer [6], the injection of electrons from the substrate [7], and surface trapping processes [8]. These mechanisms are typically fully recoverable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were biased in the off-state with V GS = −7V and V DS = 100V for a time period of 1000s before pulsing to the on-state with V GS = 0V, V DS = 1V. This corresponds to a "worst case" V DS for dynamic R ON measurement [23,24]. The on-state current, I DON , was then recorded for 1000s allowing the device to return towards equilibrium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%