2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2016.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of chars and readily available carbon on soil microbial respiration and microbial community composition in a dynamic incubation experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
14
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
7
14
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As a number of families belonging to Actinobacteria have been characterized as a group that plays an important role in the decomposition of plant cell wall polymers and recalcitrant organic matter (50), we expected the increased soil C% associated with the biochar and Napier grass root exudates would favor the Actinobacteria. Unexpectedly, we observed a decrease in the Actinomycetales relative abundance in biochar-amended samples, which was contrary to the findings of previous studies (32,34,35,38,51). However, previous reports on biochar functionality related to shifts in microbial community composition were often carried out in short-term studies (e.g., less than 1 year) (32,34,35,38,51).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a number of families belonging to Actinobacteria have been characterized as a group that plays an important role in the decomposition of plant cell wall polymers and recalcitrant organic matter (50), we expected the increased soil C% associated with the biochar and Napier grass root exudates would favor the Actinobacteria. Unexpectedly, we observed a decrease in the Actinomycetales relative abundance in biochar-amended samples, which was contrary to the findings of previous studies (32,34,35,38,51). However, previous reports on biochar functionality related to shifts in microbial community composition were often carried out in short-term studies (e.g., less than 1 year) (32,34,35,38,51).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Unexpectedly, we observed a decrease in the Actinomycetales relative abundance in biochar-amended samples, which was contrary to the findings of previous studies (32,34,35,38,51). However, previous reports on biochar functionality related to shifts in microbial community composition were often carried out in short-term studies (e.g., less than 1 year) (32,34,35,38,51). In contrast, studies have reported decreases in their relative abundance at least 2 years after the initial addition of biochar (44,52).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with traditional fertilization on sweet corn grown soil, biochar amendment had a larger influence on microorganisms (Nielsen et al, ). However, this was in contrast to Lanza, Rebensburg, Kern, Lentzsch, and Wirth (), who showed in short‐term incubation studies that adding hydrothermal carbonization char into soil did not significantly alter the microbial community distribution. These inconsistent results could be due to different experimental methods (i.e., pot trials, the experimental period), the natural history of the soil, and/or the physicochemical properties and pyrolysis temperature of the biochar.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…In this context, Suppadit et al () found high increments in plant height, dry weight, yield, and nutrient amounts in some legumes as a result of biochar application. Also, Lanza et al () reported that biochar addition caused marked shifts in microbial populations, especially for plant growth‐promoting microorganisms (PGPM).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%