Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common brain tumor in children. However, it is relatively rare in adults, with an estimated incidence of 0.6 per million. 1 The standardof-care management for pediatric MB is postoperative radiotherapy (RT) with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) and posterior fossa or resection bed boost followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. 2,3 Adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy in the pediatric setting has been associated with improved disease control and has allowed successful CSI dose deescalation in average-risk patients. [2][3][4][5] Even though chemotherapy is used routinely for pediatric patients, its benefit in adult MB is unclear. Data supporting adjuvant chemotherapy in the adult MB population are scarce. There are no randomized trials investigating the benefit of chemotherapy in adult MB, and evidence is generally limited to small retrospective series reported over several decades with conflicting results. [6][7][8][9] Furthermore, compared with children, adults may suffer less toxicity from CSI and greater morbidity from chemotherapy. This may lead to hesitancy in using postoperative chemotherapy,
Adjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival in adult medulloblastoma
AbstractBackground. Although chemotherapy is used routinely in pediatric medulloblastoma (MB) patients, its benefit for adult MB is unclear. We evaluated the survival impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in adult MB. Methods. Using the National Cancer Data Base, we identified patients aged 18 years and older who were diagnosed with MB in 2004-2012 and underwent surgical resection and adjuvant craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Patients were divided into those who received adjuvant CSI and chemotherapy (CRT) or CSI alone (RT). Predictors of CRT compared with RT were evaluated with univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Survival analysis was limited to patients receiving CSI doses between 23 and 36 Gy. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling, and propensity score matching. Results. Of the 751 patients included, 520 (69.2%) received CRT, and 231 (30.8%) received RT. With median followup of 5.0 years, estimated 5-year OS was superior in patients receiving CRT versus RT (86.1% vs 71.6%, P < .0001). On multivariable analysis, after controlling for risk factors, CRT was associated with superior OS compared with RT (HR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.32-0.88, P = .01). On planned subgroup analyses, the 5 year OS of patients receiving CRT versus RT was improved for M0 patients (P < .0001), for patients receiving 36 Gy CSI (P = .0007), and for M0 patients receiving 36 Gy CSI (P = .0008). Conclusions. This national database analysis demonstrates that combined postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy are associated with superior survival for adult MB compared with radiotherapy alone, even for M0 patients who receive high-dose CSI.