2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of crema on expected and actual espresso coffee experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Illy (2002, p. 90), writing in Scientific American, cell wall fragments (solid materials) make their way into the crema, along with less desirable aroma notes, thus potentially reducing the pleasantness of the tasting/drinking experience. In addition to the sensory perception of espresso, crema also exerts a major impact on the consumers' hedonic experience (Labbe, Sudre, Dugas, & Folmer, 2016). Thus, transparency may be good for the drinking vessels used to serve espresso as it will presumably help to draw the taster's attention to the quality of the crema.…”
Section: Other Visual Appearance Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Illy (2002, p. 90), writing in Scientific American, cell wall fragments (solid materials) make their way into the crema, along with less desirable aroma notes, thus potentially reducing the pleasantness of the tasting/drinking experience. In addition to the sensory perception of espresso, crema also exerts a major impact on the consumers' hedonic experience (Labbe, Sudre, Dugas, & Folmer, 2016). Thus, transparency may be good for the drinking vessels used to serve espresso as it will presumably help to draw the taster's attention to the quality of the crema.…”
Section: Other Visual Appearance Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] In Figure 1, it can also be observed that there are two attributes of taste/flavor that separate espresso samples from French press samples regardless of their origin (Colima or Hidalgo): 'acidity', and 'body'. The judges described the samples obtained by the espresso method homogeneously, which could be due to sensory and hedonic expectations that influence the real perception of food as mentioned by Labbe et al, [19] , when the judges observe the presence of cream in the samples, they expect more acidity and body.…”
Section: Multiple Correspondence Analysis (Mca)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There are many studies related to different methods of preparation and the chemical and sensorial impact in the brew. [1,17,18] Labbe et al, [19] mentioned that the cream is formed in the espresso method, which is a typical characteristic and one of the greater sensorial impacts of this preparation, whereas the French press method did not present much cream. Because of the above, there was a significant difference between samples where the 'persistence of cream' attribute was compared.…”
Section: Differences Between Samplesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Whereas many recent studies have investigated mainly the roasting (Bustos-Vanegas et al, 2018; Gloess et al, 2018) and brewing steps of coffee production (Parenti et al, 2014; Labbe et al, 2016), the impacts of the post-harvest processing of the coffee cherries and beans, besides genetic attributes of coffee varieties and farming practices, on the coffee quality still remain an open field of research (Lee et al, 2015; Vaughan et al, 2015; De Bruyn et al, 2017; Waters et al, 2017; Pereira et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2019). Among numerous post-harvest processing practices, wet processing is commonly applied for Coffea arabica to generate high-quality Arabica coffee.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%