“…Identification of confounding factors (e.g., sex, age and duration of symptoms) was mostly adequate, except in six studies that appeared to miss key confounders ( 47 , 52 , 56 , 58 , 60 , 61 ), most commonly due to lack of complete exclusion criteria, and two studies that appeared to be missing most confounders ( 32 , 49 ). Strategies to deal with confounders was performed to a lower quality, with 13 studies deemed unclear ( 38 , 39 , 50 , 52 , 53 , 55 , 58 , 60 , 61 , 66 , 73 , 77 , 79 ), and four studies deemed inadequate ( 32 , 47 , 48 , 56 ), most commonly due to a lack of a multivariate regression analysis. The cohorts were deemed either free of the outcome at the start of all studies or this criteria was not applicable, if for example the outcome was improvement in neurological status.…”