DOI: 10.31274/etd-180810-5165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of dietary fat composition on digestion, metabolism and deposition of fat in the growing pig

Abstract: Appreciation is expressed to the National Pork Board, USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture for financial support for this research. Appreciation is also expressed to Ajinomoto Heartland, DSM, Feed Energy Company, Gourley Research Group, JBS (Marshalltown, IA), and Tyson (Storm Lake, IA) for their in-kind contributions. Next, I would like to thank the past and present members of the applied swine nutrition lab group, other graduate student colleagues, and the animal science department faculty and sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 113 publications
(174 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ATTD of AEE increased as mean PS decreased in finishing pigs but in growing pigs, it was similar at 700 and 500 μm and greater at 300 µm. The difference between growing and finishing pigs is probably the consequence of the influence of intestinal endogenous secretions ( Kellner, 2017 ). In this case, it is possible that greater endogenous losses in finishing pigs may lower apparent digestibility of AEE compared to growing pigs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ATTD of AEE increased as mean PS decreased in finishing pigs but in growing pigs, it was similar at 700 and 500 μm and greater at 300 µm. The difference between growing and finishing pigs is probably the consequence of the influence of intestinal endogenous secretions ( Kellner, 2017 ). In this case, it is possible that greater endogenous losses in finishing pigs may lower apparent digestibility of AEE compared to growing pigs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%