2017
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyx030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of divergent differentiation in urothelial carcinoma on oncological outcome in patients with T1 high-grade bladder cancer

Abstract: Objective: T1 high-grade bladder cancer has a poor prognosis compared with other non-muscleinvasive bladder cancers. We investigated the clinical outcomes among patients with T1 highgrade bladder cancer to identify factors related to cancer recurrence and disease progression. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 148 patients who were diagnosed with T1 highgrade bladder cancer by transurethral resection from January 2001 to February 2015 at our institution. Clinicopathological factors were analyzed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
6
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study has concluded that presence of diverse differentiation of UC at TURBT was an independent predictor of metastasis (P = 0.007) without remarkable association with survival prediction (Wasco et al, 2007). These study results agree with another study result that found a significant difference between divergent differentiation with squamous differentiation and pure UC in PFS, Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS), and Cancer-Specific Survival (CSS) (Fujii et al, 2017). Another study revealed the predominance of variant TCC with 51%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The study has concluded that presence of diverse differentiation of UC at TURBT was an independent predictor of metastasis (P = 0.007) without remarkable association with survival prediction (Wasco et al, 2007). These study results agree with another study result that found a significant difference between divergent differentiation with squamous differentiation and pure UC in PFS, Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS), and Cancer-Specific Survival (CSS) (Fujii et al, 2017). Another study revealed the predominance of variant TCC with 51%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Accordingly, a scarce response to BCG therapy has been reported by Gofrit et al [54], with lower 5-year survival rates compared to patients with pure HG UC (79.1 vs. 89.5%, respectively). In keeping with this, the presence of a squamous component was associated with a poorer prognosis than GD in T1-HG NMIBC conservatively treated with intravesical chemotherapy (mitomycin C, Adriamycin, pirarubicin) and BCG [76], and was a prognostic factor for recurrence and progression in a large series of 213 T1 NMIBC managed cases with intravesical chemotherapy (epirubicin or hydroxycamptothecin) [96].…”
Section: Squamous Differentiationsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In two further studies on 41 VH-NMIBC cases (14 MV, 13 SD, 9 GD, 7 NV) and 62 SD/GD-NMIBC cases, respectively, treated with BCG, versus pure UC, the 5-year outcome rates (RFS, PFS, CSS, and OS) were poorer overall [54,75], reflecting decreased response rates to BCG as well as a lower chance for efficient salvage therapy after progression [54]. Accordingly, Fujii et al [76] reported on VH as the only independent predictor of both RFS and PFS in a cohort (59% GD, 29% GD, 12% SD + GD) of patients with T1-HG UC conservatively treated (intravesical chemotherapy, BCG). Recently, higher 2-year RFS after treatment with BCG was described in VH patients compared to pure UC at both univariate (62.1 vs. 38.0%, p < 0.05) and multivariate analysis (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.25-0.73) [77].…”
Section: Nmibc With Vh: Critical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The present study indicated that a larger tumor size (>3.5 cm) was an independent prognostic factor in patients with T1HG BC. A previous study indicated that recurrence, progression and poorer survival rates were more common in patients with larger tumors (26). In the present study, the marital status had a significant prognostic value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%