2001
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200105000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Double Counting and Transfer Bias on Estimated Rates and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: Double counting patients has resulted in a significant overestimation in the incidence rate for hospitalization for acute MI. Correction of this double counting reveals a significantly lower incidence rate and a higher in-hospital mortality rate for acute MI. Transferred patients differ significantly from nontransferred patients, introducing significant bias into MI outcome studies. Double counting and transfer bias should be considered when conducting and interpreting research on ischemic heart disease, parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the possibility of double counting, hospitalizations of patients who were discharged to another short-term care facility were not included in the analysis. 14 Infants ,1 day old were also excluded because these cases were predominantly normal newborns. National weighted estimates of all hospitalized children aged 0 to 3 years with any ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for maltreatment (995.50-995.59) or an E-code (E960-E967.9) for assault were calculated excluding sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect.…”
Section: E1796mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the possibility of double counting, hospitalizations of patients who were discharged to another short-term care facility were not included in the analysis. 14 Infants ,1 day old were also excluded because these cases were predominantly normal newborns. National weighted estimates of all hospitalized children aged 0 to 3 years with any ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for maltreatment (995.50-995.59) or an E-code (E960-E967.9) for assault were calculated excluding sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect.…”
Section: E1796mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid overestimating the ATV-related injury incidence because of double-counting, hospitalizations (n ϭ 44) that resulted in transfer to another short-term hospital were excluded from analysis. 21 Short-term hospital transfers were retained for analysis of charges. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NIS contains no unique identifiers, so to reduce the effects of double counting multiple hospitalizations for the same drowningrelated injury, the hospitalizations of patients who were discharged to another short-term care hospital were not included in the analysis (ie, only the terminal hospital admission was included). 12 This assumes that these cases would likely be captured at the point of the definitive drowning care in the receiving hospital records.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%