2019
DOI: 10.9788/tp2019.3-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of eual rientation ocial upport and Family upport on Minority tress in L People

Abstract: Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals may have lower levels of mental health compared to heterosexual people. This study examined the impact of sexual orientation on the components of minority stress (victimization, internalized homophobi a and concealment of sexual orientation), and the moderating role of social and family support in the relationship between sexual orientation and minority stress components. A total of 715 LGB people participated in this study, of which 29.1% reported being lesbian (n … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This new approach allows people who do not conform to the gender binary to disclose their identity as not belonging to this traditional model-however, this othering of individuals may result as invalidating of their realities, as it implicitly suggests that only cisgender, binary individuals are allowed to express their actual identity and all non-binary genders are discarded to this separate category (Morrison et al, 2021). This is solved by substituting the "other" alternative with an open-ended question (Paveltchuk et al, 2019); this option helps collecting the details of the identities that fall under this category, however it might hinder the automatization of data processing and analysis.…”
Section: � Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new approach allows people who do not conform to the gender binary to disclose their identity as not belonging to this traditional model-however, this othering of individuals may result as invalidating of their realities, as it implicitly suggests that only cisgender, binary individuals are allowed to express their actual identity and all non-binary genders are discarded to this separate category (Morrison et al, 2021). This is solved by substituting the "other" alternative with an open-ended question (Paveltchuk et al, 2019); this option helps collecting the details of the identities that fall under this category, however it might hinder the automatization of data processing and analysis.…”
Section: � Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%