Impact of financial inclusion on technical efficiency of paddy farmers in Bangladesh

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of financial inclusion on the enhancement of paddy farmers’ technical efficiency (TE). The impact was evaluated rigorously from different dimensions which could be useful in the policy discussion for enhancing efficiency in utilizing productive resources. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional data of randomly selected 120 paddy farmers from Khulna district in the Southwest region of Bangladesh were collected for this study. Initially, a stochastic production frontier approach was used for estimating farmers’ TE. Thereafter, ordinary least squares and quantile regression models were applied for unveiling the existing relationship between TE and various dimensions of financial inclusion after controlling all other socio-economic characteristics. Findings The study findings revealed that farmers were around 86 percent technically efficient and amongst them, credit takers were more efficient than non-credit takers. A non-monotonic relationship between TE and amount of credit was observed where TE was maximized at amount around 20,000 Bangladeshi Taka (USD255), a medium credit in terms of its amount. In addition, credit literacy was identified as a significant factor for improving TE. Though difference in the choice of sources for accessing credit had little impact on mean TE, its effect was found significantly higher for low scored technically efficient farmers compared to high scored farmers. Practical implications The policy toward widening the coverage of financial inclusion would be more effective than providing larger amount of credit to a limited number of farmers for improving their TE. Originality/value Such an in-depth assessment of the impact of financial inclusion on TE is probably the first effort in the Khulna district of Bangladesh.

Effects of agricultural credit on wheat productivity of small farms in Sindh, Pakistan

“…This finding is to some extent similar to the findings of earlier studies (e.g. Iqbal et al, 2003;Bashir et al, 2010;Abdallah, 2016;Afrin et al, 2017). However, they treated agricultural credit as a whole.…”

Innovative Financial Approach for Agricultural Sustainability: A Case Study of Alibaba

“…Although these technologies are effective in reducing waste emission and resource consumption, they may not be adopted by farmers in underprivileged regions because of their poor access to capital markets [15,16]. On the contrary, inclusive credit access positively influences technological efficiency in poor countries [42]. In addition, extant literature shows that financial means is effective in reducing poverty, thereby improving the social aspect of sustainability in rural regions [17,18].…”

The Alfredo Namitete Agroecology Credit System: A New Business Model That Supports Small-Scale Lending

“…The literature review assesses different credit schemes applied in different geographical [29][30][31][32][33][34], and historical contexts [35][36][37][38], to analyse the range of options available to farmers. Literature of the past 10 years was reviewed, featuring a wide range of financial schemes including public and private credit, formal and informal schemes, credit for farmers and credit for the poor, microfinance and different inclusive models for agricultural development.…”

“…To summarise the articulation between these selected examples from the literature, it can be said that credit in early nineteenth-century Europe was a reaction to excessive interest rates and was characterised by self-help and mutual guarantee, with capital coming from the members' deposits [35]. The downside was the availability of capital, which soon became insufficient to cover the demand for credit.…”