2012
DOI: 10.1118/1.4747260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of flat panel‐imager veiling glare on scatter‐estimation accuracy and image quality of a commercial on‐board cone‐beam CT imaging system

Abstract: The long tails of the detector PSF were found to have a modest dependence of beam spectrum, which is reflected on the MTF curve LFD. Our findings show that uncorrected veiling glare can affect quantitative accuracy and contrast in CBCT imaging, based on flat panel imager. In addition, it results in overestimation of the scatter-to-primary ratio, measured with the beam-stop methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the beam stop size affects scatter intensity, SPR and T S measurements were performed using four different diameter beam stops (their diameters were 3.5, 7.2, 10.5, and 13.6 mm at the detector plane), and they were linearly extrapolated to "0" beam stop diameter by using least squares polynomial fitting. [34][35][36] In the Results section, SPR and T S values at "0" beam stop diameter, and their standard errors were presented. An example of measured SPR and Ts values versus beam stop diameter was shown in Fig.…”
Section: D Measurement Of Scatter Transmission Fraction and Scattementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the beam stop size affects scatter intensity, SPR and T S measurements were performed using four different diameter beam stops (their diameters were 3.5, 7.2, 10.5, and 13.6 mm at the detector plane), and they were linearly extrapolated to "0" beam stop diameter by using least squares polynomial fitting. [34][35][36] In the Results section, SPR and T S values at "0" beam stop diameter, and their standard errors were presented. An example of measured SPR and Ts values versus beam stop diameter was shown in Fig.…”
Section: D Measurement Of Scatter Transmission Fraction and Scattementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although initial results showed there was almost no difference in the first‐ and second‐pass Acuros results, future investigations may still be warranted. Indeed, with Acuros’ better scatter correction, other remaining artifacts will become more substantial, such as lag, bone beam hardening, or residual detector scatter (veiling glare) revealing possibly the next “layer of the onion” to be addressed in further improving CBCT image quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a beam-blocker method(Segui and Zhao, 2006; Niu and Zhu, 2011; Lazos and Williamson, 2012) with blocking disks of 2mm - 7 cm for the case of θ = 0° and for HE and LE exposures equal to that used for the single-pinhole case. The beam blocker method will deliver a scatter value s BB at the pinhole shadow location.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%