2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Flowback Dynamics on Fracture Conductivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The success of hydraulic fracturing relies on a multitude of parameters such as proppant transport and placement efficiency, , proppant strength relative to the downhole minimum horizontal stress, hardness of the proppant and fractured formation shaping the proppant embedment tendency, fracturing fluid leak-off into the formation and its flow-back, and fracture propagation. Although surface properties directly impact flow and transport, there are very few studies that examined the effect of proppant wettability characteristics on fracture flow performance. Those studies performed either microscale or macroscale core flooding or proxy experiments like sandpack flooding and column testing to infer the fluid flow efficiency for different proppant affinities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of hydraulic fracturing relies on a multitude of parameters such as proppant transport and placement efficiency, , proppant strength relative to the downhole minimum horizontal stress, hardness of the proppant and fractured formation shaping the proppant embedment tendency, fracturing fluid leak-off into the formation and its flow-back, and fracture propagation. Although surface properties directly impact flow and transport, there are very few studies that examined the effect of proppant wettability characteristics on fracture flow performance. Those studies performed either microscale or macroscale core flooding or proxy experiments like sandpack flooding and column testing to infer the fluid flow efficiency for different proppant affinities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study is just around the upper structure wind load response of dynamic mechanical characteristics, but seldom consider the lower inherent mechanical properties of rock mass structural materials and its stability affected by wind load counter attack tall structures. However, the research of high structure stability evaluation of the wind vibration and wind resistance design has its limitations (Ken et al, 2015;Osiptsov et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multistage hydraulic fracturing (MHF) was utilized in the development of tight sand gas reservoirs earlier than that of shale gas reservoirs. In the tight sand gas reservoir, the flowback process is critical, because the fracturing fluids create a blocking at the matrix-fracture interface after MHF operation, which hinders gas-flow capacity because of the low reservoir permeability (≤0.1 mD) and porosity (≤10%). The clay swelling and migration caused by the fluid-rock reaction is another reason for impairing the permeability of the tight sand gas reservoir . Therefore, pursuing a high flowback rate of hydraulic fracturing fluid (HFF) is the key to gaining a high tight sand gas production rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%