2015
DOI: 10.2514/1.j053529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Forward-Facing Steps on Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Transonic Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from the linear analysis, and more generally the results from the DNS presented in § 4, underline the attractiveness of replacing a forward-facing sharp step (γ = 1) with largê h by a smooth one (γ < 1) because the smooth step with the sameĥ does not lead to a separation bubble. We attribute the discrepancy between the current findings and the work of Edelmann & Rist (2015) to a step-induced separation bubble that has a strong destabilising effect on the TS mode. Furthermore, for a forward-facing smooth step of fixed height, the position of the global maximum value of a contour varies with respect to the given frequency, which is consistent with the relative position of the step with respect to the position of the upper branch when changing frequency in the neutral curve diagram (figure 7(g,i,k) for example).…”
Section: 3contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results from the linear analysis, and more generally the results from the DNS presented in § 4, underline the attractiveness of replacing a forward-facing sharp step (γ = 1) with largê h by a smooth one (γ < 1) because the smooth step with the sameĥ does not lead to a separation bubble. We attribute the discrepancy between the current findings and the work of Edelmann & Rist (2015) to a step-induced separation bubble that has a strong destabilising effect on the TS mode. Furthermore, for a forward-facing smooth step of fixed height, the position of the global maximum value of a contour varies with respect to the given frequency, which is consistent with the relative position of the step with respect to the position of the upper branch when changing frequency in the neutral curve diagram (figure 7(g,i,k) for example).…”
Section: 3contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, a strong destabilisation of the TS wave by the sharp step (γ = 1) for low frequency is reported by Edelmann & Rist (2015), where the separation bubble induces a strong increase in N-factor from N = 4 to N = 6 because of the existence of separation bubbles in front of the step. This contrasts with the weak destabilisation influence of a smooth step on the TS wave in a boundary layer, where negligible variation of the N-factor can be seen in figure 13 even for a largeĥ > 20 % step height.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further studies on surface deformations have examined the effect of humps [29][30][31][32], dimples [33], corrugation [34], steps [35][36][37][38][39], roughness distributions [40,41], and deep gaps [42]. More recently, Xu et al [43] studied the impact of three-dimensional surface indentations on the destabilization of TS disturbances, where separation bubbles could form within sufficiently deformed indentations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%