2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of fused deposition process parameter (infill pattern) on the strength of PETG part

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the infill pattern also plays a pivotal role in defining the strength of the 3D printed PETG parts. [12] It is seen that the grid pattern offers the highest mechanical strength for practical applications followed by the honeycomb pattern. Similarly, on extrapolating this observation to the effect of infill density, a complete 100% infill offers the highest strength parameters for 3D printed PETG parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, the infill pattern also plays a pivotal role in defining the strength of the 3D printed PETG parts. [12] It is seen that the grid pattern offers the highest mechanical strength for practical applications followed by the honeycomb pattern. Similarly, on extrapolating this observation to the effect of infill density, a complete 100% infill offers the highest strength parameters for 3D printed PETG parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Reports in the literature show lower or similar values in FFF specimens produced with pure, unrecycled PET, at around 28.12 MPa [ 36 ], while literature on recycled FFF PETG reports similar results, with a slight increase in the tensile strength when compared to pure PETG [ 17 ]. On the other hand, other studies report a decrease in the tensile strength with rounds of recycling of PETG [ 32 , 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Previous studies on the mechanical properties of PET-G structures processed by FDM [ 25 , 26 , 31 , 32 , 33 ] analyzed the material by performing an experimental investigation on tensile properties. However, little work has been performed to evaluate the crashworthiness behavior of PET-G honeycomb structures due to the manufacturing and machine-processing related factors from FDM printing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the manufacturing of the test specimens, this study mainly focuses on varying two process parameters of the 3D printer: infill density and building direction. Meanwhile, based on studies by Rodríguez-Panes et al [ 41 ], Durgashyam et al [ 31 ], Dupaix and Boyce [ 33 ], and Srinivasan et al [ 25 ], the layer thickness, infill pattern, and printing angle of layers remained constant to evaluate the mechanical and surface properties of FDM printed PET-G parts as a means of gaining better insight into the relations between the 3D printed morphology of the honeycomb structure and the mechanical performance as the infill density and building direction are changed. The response of the hexagonal honeycomb was analyzed quasi-statically via compression essays along the transverse direction from the XY plane to determine the effects of the selected mechanical properties on the performance of the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation