2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40815-019-00666-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Fuzziness Measures on the Performance of Semi-supervised Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning [10][11][12][13][14][15] techniques can be broadly categorized into two groups, such as supervised learning and unsupervised [16] learning. Supervised learning is the most popular approach, where the class label of each training tuple is known.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning [10][11][12][13][14][15] techniques can be broadly categorized into two groups, such as supervised learning and unsupervised [16] learning. Supervised learning is the most popular approach, where the class label of each training tuple is known.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term fuzziness was first proposed by Lotfi A. Zadeh in 1965 in association with his great invention fuzzy set theory [40]. And the theory has been used in semi-supervised learning [39], here we also use it to measure the prediction confidence of FWCDT.…”
Section: A Self-training Fwcdtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unimodal approach works on a single image, these are intergalactic time, stochastic, rule-based, & shape-based approaches. An intergalactic time approach describes the collection of temporal features [1,2] or trajectories [3,4] whereas stochastic approach comprise the action through statistical facsimiles [5][6][7] . The Rule-based approach follows custom protocol and designates human actions [8,9] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%