Impact of Gender on Publication Productivity and Scientific Collaboration

Biloshchytskyi, Andrii; Kuchansky, Alexander; Andrashko, Yurii; Гладка, Мирослава Вікторівна

doi:10.1109/sist54437.2022.9945745

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An increase in the scientific publishing activity of the authors contributes to the growth of the scientific productivity of the institutions with which these authors are affiliated. The described study continues the research published in previous works [22,37].…”

supporting

confidence: 80%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Gender-Related Differences in the Citation Impact of Scientific Publications and Improving the Authors’ Productivity

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article’s purpose is an analysis of the citation impact of scientific publications by authors of different gender compositions. The page method was chosen to calculate the citation impact of scientific publications, and the obtained results allowed to estimate the impact of the scientific publications based on the number of citations. The normalized citation impact is calculated according to nine subsets of scientific publications that correspond to patterns of different gender compositions of authors. Also, these estimates were calculated for each country with which the authors of the publications are affiliated. The Citation database, Network Dataset (Ver. 13), was chosen for the scientometric analysis. The dataset includes more than 5 million scientific publications and 48 million citations. Most of the publications in the dataset are from the STEM field. The results indicate that articles with a predominantly male composition are cited more than articles with a mixed or female composition of authors in this direction. Analysis of advantages in dynamics indicates that in the last decade, in developed countries, there has been a decrease in the connection between the citation impact of scientific publications and the gender composition of their authors. However, the obtained results still confirm the presence of gender inequality in science, which may be related to socioeconomic and cultural characteristics, natural homophily, and other factors that contribute to the appearance of gender gaps. An essential consequence of overcoming these gaps, including in science, is ensuring the rights of people in all their diversity.

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 80%

“…To calculate citation impact, the number of citations of scientific publications was counted. Also, for citation impact calculation, the PageRank method was used [36,37].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender-Related Differences in the Citation Impact of Scientific Publications and Improving the Authors’ Productivity

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The second task which involves the evaluation of research activities based on the publication records of scientists has also seen partial resolution. In reference [2], a method is presented for deriving comprehensive assessments of the outcomes of scientific research endeavors conducted by researchers. This method holds applicability in conducting a holistic evaluation of scientists, universities, and their constituent units.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Task of Choosing Partners for the Organization of Cooperation in the Framework of Scientific and Educational Projects

Biloshchytskyi,

Kuchansky,

Mukhatayev

et al. 2023

sjaitu

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The primary objective of this article is to establish a set of fundamental criteria for the selection of scientific partners for collaborative research efforts. Achieving this objective entails addressing the challenge of identifying criteria that are both objective and universally applicable, capable of encompassing various fields of scientific research, such as natural sciences, technical sciences, and economic sciences, among others. One such criterion, applicable to scientists, may involve assessing their publication activity within specific research areas that align with the objectives of the relevant scientific research or international projects. In the contemporary landscape of scientific research, there is a growing urgency to enhance the effectiveness of research endeavors and to foster efficient collaboration within scientific communities. This is particularly vital for organizations oriented towards project-based research. In the formation of research project teams, a conventional approach is to select partners from the pool of scientists possessing the requisite qualifications and experience in the execution of such projects. A widely accepted yardstick for evaluating the outcomes of scientists' research endeavors is the citation metrics associated with their publications. Typically, these metrics take the form of scalar values. While this approach offers several advantages, it is not without its limitations. One notable drawback is the potential loss of information when converting raw data into scalar metrics, and the existence of certain edge cases where the parameter remains unchanged despite variations in the number of citations and publications. Hence, it is pertinent to explore the development of new methodologies or modifications to existing ones that can effectively evaluate the results of scientists' research activities while mitigating these limitations.Начало формы The article describes the criteria for the search and selection of partners for joint scientific research. This will make it possible to effectively form teams for narrowly focused scientific research or international collaboration projects in interdisciplinary scientific projects such as the European Horizon Program or educational projects such as the Erasmus plus program. Also, the proposed solution will allow the formation of small teams for joint scientific publications. It is imperative to acknowledge that the process of partner selection is predominantly driven by a consideration of the knowledge, whether it be novel or foundational, possessed by prospective partners who are entrusted with the execution of a project. It becomes crucial to delineate the specific criteria governing partner selection which can vary contingent upon factors such as the typology of partners, the nature of project tasks, the depth of knowledge possessed, and related contextual variables. A vital underpinning for the formation of project consortia is the mathematical conundrum of choice which furnishes a formal rationale for the judicious selection of a particular partner.

show abstract

Method of Allocation of Labor Resources for IT Project Based on Expert Assessements of Delphi

Gladka,

Kuchanskyi,

Kostikov

et al. 2023

2023 IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Impact of Gender on Publication Productivity and Scientific Collaboration

Cited by 4 publications

References 17 publications

Gender-Related Differences in the Citation Impact of Scientific Publications and Improving the Authors’ Productivity

Gender-Related Differences in the Citation Impact of Scientific Publications and Improving the Authors’ Productivity

The Task of Choosing Partners for the Organization of Cooperation in the Framework of Scientific and Educational Projects

Method of Allocation of Labor Resources for IT Project Based on Expert Assessements of Delphi

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About