2017
DOI: 10.1080/1062936x.2017.1343253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of geometry optimization methods on QSAR modelling: A case study for predicting human serum albumin binding affinity

Abstract: Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modelling is a major tool employed in the prediction of various endpoints. However, current QSAR literature is missing a full understanding of the impact of quantum chemical calculation methods on the estimation of molecular descriptors and model performance. Here, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the quantitative effects of different geometry optimization methods (semi-empirical, ab initio Hartee-Fock and density functional theory) on the molecular des… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DRAGON [ 55 ] software (version 7.0) was used to obtain the 0-2D (two-dimension) molecular descriptors. As most 3D descriptor groups encoding 3D structures were found to be sensitive to the quantum chemical calculation method [ 56 ] which can influence the accuracy of QSAR model, we therefore excluded the 3D descriptors. The total number of 0-2D descriptors was 3822.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The DRAGON [ 55 ] software (version 7.0) was used to obtain the 0-2D (two-dimension) molecular descriptors. As most 3D descriptor groups encoding 3D structures were found to be sensitive to the quantum chemical calculation method [ 56 ] which can influence the accuracy of QSAR model, we therefore excluded the 3D descriptors. The total number of 0-2D descriptors was 3822.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, GA was utilized to detect the solution space by maximizing the leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation correlation coefficient (Q 2 loo ) as the fitness function. To obtain the best variables, the population size, mutation rate and number of generations were set as 200, 20 and 2000, respectively [ 23 , 56 ]. Q 2 loo was chosen as it provides a measurement of model stability and robustness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After structure optimization, Dragon descriptors were calculated by DRAGON software (version 7.0) [ 50 ]. Due to most of 3D descriptors encoding 3D structures were found to be sensitive to the quantum chemical calculation method which may influence the quality of QSAR model, thus we removed the 3D descriptors [ 51 ]. DRAGON 7.0 contains 22 2D molecular descriptor blocks (e.g., constitutional indices, ring descriptors, topological indices, connectivity indices, and so on), which consist of a total of 3822 0-2D descriptors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies focused on albumin serum affinity (HSA) with methods as SVM or HA ( 8 ) or tried to integrate QSAR and docking scores ( 9 ), including geometry optimization before modeling to improve performance ( 10 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%