2011
DOI: 10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Giving Students a Choice of Homework Assignments in an Introductory Computer Science Class

Abstract: Becker, K. (2006). How much choice is too much? Paper presented at the Working group reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This has not necessarily been the case with other studies in the literature, which have also found that giving limited choice in the type of assignments or homework students can result in greater gains on assessments. Fulton and Schweitzer (2011) found that giving students a choice in the type of final class assignment (one defined as easier, the other more challenging) in a computer science class resulted in lower performing students choosing an easier assignment option and therefore learning less than their peers. However, similar to this study, in a meta-study literature analysis on the effects of choice in a variety of settings, Katz and Assor (2007) found that choice motivates students when the choices are limited and aligned with student interests and goals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has not necessarily been the case with other studies in the literature, which have also found that giving limited choice in the type of assignments or homework students can result in greater gains on assessments. Fulton and Schweitzer (2011) found that giving students a choice in the type of final class assignment (one defined as easier, the other more challenging) in a computer science class resulted in lower performing students choosing an easier assignment option and therefore learning less than their peers. However, similar to this study, in a meta-study literature analysis on the effects of choice in a variety of settings, Katz and Assor (2007) found that choice motivates students when the choices are limited and aligned with student interests and goals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Den relativt ensidiga skriftliga uppgiftsformen kan å andra sidan i enlighet med Fidaldo och Turman (2017) inverka negativt på studenternas lärprocess. En mer varierad form av uppgifter kan vara positivt ur flera aspekter (Fulton & Schweitzer, 2011). Resultatet kan tolkas som att uppgifterna i sin formulering visar på normativa inslag snarare än att ge studenterna frihet att själva forma uppgifterna.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified
“…Den kunskapsmediering som uppgiften skulle vara ett led i går på det sättet förlorad (Säljö, 2013). För de studenter med ingen eller liten erfarenhet av akademiskt skrivande och den akademiska kunskapskulturen kan den friare formen av uppgiftsbeskrivning vara alltför bristfällig för att understödja studenternas lärprocess (Fulton & Schweitzer, 2011). Ask (2007) pekar på vikten av att kravet på den kritiskt analytiska förmågan tydligt framgår i uppgifterna och menar att det inte kan ses som självklart för studenterna att uppfatta att detta ingår som krav.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified
“…Offering learners a choice in their assignments empowers them to take control, providing ownership of their learning process and motivating them to be engaged. This leads to increased interest and increased time spent on the chosen assignment [18]. The freedom to choose what, when, and how to contribute in the learning process can motivate learners to actively participate and accomplish more [19].…”
Section: Background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%