2011
DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.92021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Gleason pattern up gradation after radical prostatectomy for carcinoma prostate patients with low biopsy score (≤ 6)

Abstract: b-GS upgradation after radical prostatectomy is frequent and correlates with adverse pathological features, higher use of adjuvant therapy and higher recurrence rate. In Group B, adjuvant therapy delays the biochemical or clinical relapse and controls mortality in short-term follow up. Group A had favorable pathological findings and less recurrence rate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
5
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gleason score is the most widely used predictive preoperative histological parameter of tumor spread in urological practice and is considered capable of predicting tumor behavior, with the ability to differentiate between aggressive and benign disease (24,25). However, previous studies (27-29) and our ongoing study indicate that the Gleason score is likely underestimated by preoperative biopsy of the prostate in approximately 40% of cases, resulting in false-negative results. This may hinder the accurate diagnosis of benign vs aggressive prostate cancer (27-29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Gleason score is the most widely used predictive preoperative histological parameter of tumor spread in urological practice and is considered capable of predicting tumor behavior, with the ability to differentiate between aggressive and benign disease (24,25). However, previous studies (27-29) and our ongoing study indicate that the Gleason score is likely underestimated by preoperative biopsy of the prostate in approximately 40% of cases, resulting in false-negative results. This may hinder the accurate diagnosis of benign vs aggressive prostate cancer (27-29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, previous studies (27-29) and our ongoing study indicate that the Gleason score is likely underestimated by preoperative biopsy of the prostate in approximately 40% of cases, resulting in false-negative results. This may hinder the accurate diagnosis of benign vs aggressive prostate cancer (27-29). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…After reviewing several series, it appears that Epstein's criteria for very low risk disease are useful in predicting organ confined disease in about 90% of the cases, but Gleason score reclassification happens in 25-35% of the cases after pathological assessment [21,22], and positive margins occurs in 7-12% of the cases. Although this would seem to worsen the prognosis, there is no evidence that these findings are necessarily associated with disease progression and the need for additional treatment, therefore we consider that meeting Epstein' criteria allows predicting a favorable outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Espécimes provenientes de BaG apresentam um escore de Gleason comumente menor com relação à prostatectomia radical. Estima-se que mais de 50% apresentem um escore menor em relação à PR (COOKSON;FLESHNER et al, 1997;CRAWFORD et al, 2000;KULKARNI;VALSANGKAR et al, 2011). Outros estudos demonstraram que cerca de 40% dos homens diagnosticados com tumores de baixo grau por BaG terão como diagnóstico final tumores de alto grau (BOSTWICK, 1994;GREGORI;VIEWEG et al, 2001;CAM;YUCEL et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified