2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of HONO sources on the performance of mesoscale air quality models

Abstract: a b s t r a c tNitrous acid (HONO) photolysis constitutes a primary source of OH in the early morning, which leads to changes in model gas-phase and particulate matter concentrations. However, state-of-the-art models of chemical mechanisms share a common representation of gas-phase chemistry leading to HONO that fails in reproducing the observed profiles. Hence, there is a growing interest in improving the definition of additional HONO sources within air quality models, i.e. direct emissions or heterogeneous r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extended model with the additional HONO sources succeeded to capture the magnitude and the diurnal variations of the observed data (Table S1), e.g., promising improvement in the model performance is found for predictions of O 3 peaks in urban areas (Li et al 2011). Our results agree with other studies (Li et al 2010;Elshorbany et al 2012;Gonçalves et al 2012), showing that at least the Het and the Emis should be included in models, since their impact on second- (2010) and Spataro et al (2013). Case R is a reference case; Case E includes NO 2 * chemistry, the NO 2 heterogeneous reaction on aerosol surfaces and HONO emissions.…”
Section: Model Evaluation a Concentrations Of No Y Speciessupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extended model with the additional HONO sources succeeded to capture the magnitude and the diurnal variations of the observed data (Table S1), e.g., promising improvement in the model performance is found for predictions of O 3 peaks in urban areas (Li et al 2011). Our results agree with other studies (Li et al 2010;Elshorbany et al 2012;Gonçalves et al 2012), showing that at least the Het and the Emis should be included in models, since their impact on second- (2010) and Spataro et al (2013). Case R is a reference case; Case E includes NO 2 * chemistry, the NO 2 heterogeneous reaction on aerosol surfaces and HONO emissions.…”
Section: Model Evaluation a Concentrations Of No Y Speciessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Air quality models usually severely underestimate HONO observations even though some new HONO formation mechanisms have been considered (Li et al 2010;Gonçalves et al 2012). Previously, the NO 2 * chemistry (Li et al 2008), the NO 2 heterogeneous reaction on aerosol surfaces (Het), and HONO emissions (Emis) were implemented in the fully coupled WRF-Chem resulted in a significant improvement of HONO simulations over the BTH (Li et al 2011;2014b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current global and regional chemical transport models that consider the heterogeneous production of HONO on the ground surfaces either do not distinguish sea and land [Elshorbany et al, 2012] or do not consider the HONO formation on the sea at all [Goncalves et al, 2012;Sarwar et al, 2008;Zhang et al, 2012]. Our study indicates that HONO may be produced at a faster rate on the sea; if this finding is confirmed and applicable to other regions, current chemical transport models may need to consider HONO formation on the sea and to adopt different parameterizations for reactions on land and sea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al (2011) and Goncalves et al (2012) showed that modelled HONO was consistently lower than observations, even when the most effective recently suggested formation mechanisms were considered. This underestimation of HONO by models may be expected to impact the simulated HO x and O 3 budgets as well as other secondary products.…”
Section: Y F Elshorbany Et Al: Impact Of Hono On Global Atmospherimentioning
confidence: 99%