2019
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of including information from bulls and their daughters in the training population of multiple‐step genomic evaluations in dairy cattle: A simulation study

Abstract: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of accounting for parent average (PA) and genotyped daughters' average (GDA) on the estimation of deregressed estimated breeding values (dEBVs) used as pseudo-phenotypes in multiple-step genomic evaluations. Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) were predicted, in eight different simulated scenarios, using dEBVs calculated based on four methods. These methods included PA and GDA in the dEBV (VR) or only GDA (VRpa) and excluded both PA and GDA from t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast to female genotyping, the relative accuracy difference decrease was slight, whereas the number of genotyped rams was notably reduced (even 50%), and the average number of daughters in data was increased (around 150%), which reflects the importance of genotyping animals well connected in the population. These results confirmed that the genotyping of rams in flocks have a limited effect on prediction accuracy if they are isolated in the pedigree and without offspring records (Pszczola et al, 2012;Shabalina et al, 2017;de Oliveira et al, 2019).…”
Section: Maximum Genotypingsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…By contrast to female genotyping, the relative accuracy difference decrease was slight, whereas the number of genotyped rams was notably reduced (even 50%), and the average number of daughters in data was increased (around 150%), which reflects the importance of genotyping animals well connected in the population. These results confirmed that the genotyping of rams in flocks have a limited effect on prediction accuracy if they are isolated in the pedigree and without offspring records (Pszczola et al, 2012;Shabalina et al, 2017;de Oliveira et al, 2019).…”
Section: Maximum Genotypingsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, we hypothesize that haplotype-based methods could result in more accurate and less biased GEBV prediction when compared to SNP-based models in populations with high genetic diversity because of their development process (e.g., relatively lower selection pressures, crossbreeding) and more complex haplotype structure than observed in populations with low genetic diversity. Simulated data is an interesting approach to investigate this hypothesis because the true breeding values (TBVs) are known ( Morris et al, 2019 ; Oliveira et al, 2019 ). Therefore, we simulated sheep populations with different genetic diversity levels to test our hypothesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of simulated data is an effective way to evaluate the prediction process, since the TBVs are known and can be used to validate the EBVs (Oliveira et al, 2019). Our results showed high accuracy and low bias of EBVs, indicating that the two-step process was…”
Section: Bibliographymentioning
confidence: 75%