2010
DOI: 10.4995/wrs.2006.557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of inmediate postnatal sucking on mortality and growth of sucklings in field condition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Coureaud et al (2000) observed a close connection between immediate postnatal suckling and kit survival. Similar results were published by Farougou et al (2006) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“… Coureaud et al (2000) observed a close connection between immediate postnatal suckling and kit survival. Similar results were published by Farougou et al (2006) .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Average weaning weight of kits in litters with 8 or more kits did not exceed 940 g in comparison with kits form smaller litters, where weaning weight was between 1016 g and 1191 g. Results were comparable to that of Poigner et al (2000). Similar trend of higher growth rate in small litters was also observed in Farougou et al (2006).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Rabbit producers must take especial care of nests first week of age (Rosell, 2005). When the hygienic conditions are satisfied, a large part of the mortality before weaning is more related to a biological weakness than to a specific pathology (Farougou et al, 2006). The control of pre-weaning mortality increased the number and weight of rabbits weaned per doe per year (Rashwan and Marai, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, milk production increased with litter size, reaching its maximum capacity in response to a litter of seven kits [38]. Moreover, a close connection between the birth weight and the ratio of non-suckled kits was reported by several authors [4,39]. According to Argente et al [4], this ratio was higher than 50% when the birth weight was below 40 g and lower than 10% in kits with a birth weight higher than 65 g. Our results also showed a decrease in the correlations of the common litter effect between birth weight and weights recorded at the end of weaning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%