2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of intrinsic backbone chain stiffness on the morphologies of bottle-brush diblock copolymers

Abstract: Self-assembly methods are used for the production of photonic and nanoporous materials derived from block copolymers. In this context, bottle-brush copolymers have demonstrated a number of advantages over the respective linear copolymers, such as faster self-assembly kinetics and a richer morphology behavior. However, the effect of intrinsic molecular stiffness on the morphology of bottle-brush copolymers has been previously overlooked. Here, we inves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, branching of matrix blocks B stabilizes superstructures with spherical domains A , even if A is a majority block. These theoretical predictions are in good qualitative agreement with MD studies. , The morphological diagram of states for macromolecules with equal topological ratios of the blocks coincides with that for copolymers with linear blocks, and the lamella period H ∼ N 2/3 does not depend on copolymer composition. These predictions open novel perspectives in design of nanostructured materials.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…For example, branching of matrix blocks B stabilizes superstructures with spherical domains A , even if A is a majority block. These theoretical predictions are in good qualitative agreement with MD studies. , The morphological diagram of states for macromolecules with equal topological ratios of the blocks coincides with that for copolymers with linear blocks, and the lamella period H ∼ N 2/3 does not depend on copolymer composition. These predictions open novel perspectives in design of nanostructured materials.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…42−44 For linear BCPs, the microdomain morphology is dictated by χ, N, and the volume fraction between two blocks, while for bottlebrush copolymers, the molecular architecture plays a dominant role, and the morphologies can be tuned by the intrinsic backbone chain stiffness. 74 Bottlebrush copolymers can also be conveniently synthesized by a one-pot ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of norbornyl endfunctionalized macromonomers with distinct chemical structures. 24,45 The synthesis, self-assembly, and application of densely grafted bottlebrush copolymers have recently become increasingly popular.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With bulky side chains, the molecular backbone is more extended with a much larger persistence length, minimizing entanglements and favoring rapid self-assembly. For self-assembly in thin films, microdomains oriented normal to the substrate surface are needed for high-fidelity pattern transfer. For high-χ linear BCPs, controlling the interfacial energy coupled with confinement effects arising from commensurability between the film thickness and period of the microdomain morphology is needed to orient the microdomains normal to the substrate. , However, with the entropic gain from the chain architecture, the BBCP domains could orient normal to the surface even if one block has a strong preferential interaction with the substrate. For linear BCPs, the microdomain morphology is dictated by χ, N , and the volume fraction between two blocks, while for bottlebrush copolymers, the molecular architecture plays a dominant role, and the morphologies can be tuned by the intrinsic backbone chain stiffness . Bottlebrush copolymers can also be conveniently synthesized by a one-pot ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of norbornyl end-functionalized macromonomers with distinct chemical structures. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bottlebrush polymers have attracted considerable attention in the last few years due to their unique molecular structural features, and these materials have inspired the design of novel applications as rheological property modifiers, 1 pressure sensors, 2 photonic bandgap materials, [3][4][5] pH-sensitive probes, 6 supersoft elastomers, 7,8 nanostructured morphologies, [9][10][11][12][13] and drug delivery agents. 14 Despite advances in polymer synthesis techniques for creating branched molecules with precise control of molecular architecture, [15][16][17][18][19] as well as, experimental 7,12,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and simulation, 11,13,[28][29][30] methods to establish structure property relationships between the bottlebrush polymer architecture, a general understanding of the physical properties of these materials remains largely unexplored. Part of the scientific challenge here is that direct experimental measurements of conformational properties in the melt state are difficult and experimental observations of these properties are often performed in solution rather than in the melt state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%